I’da tossed in a ‘You’re done’ 'cause I really like callbacks.
Indeed you are correct.
Apparently some people did call a text BB system “teleconferencing” I sure didn’t hear anyone use that term back in the day.
Apparently I am wrong, and I apologize to Sam Stone unreservedly.
Attaboy.
It’s all true. You are calling me a liar with zero evidence. Prove it, or apologize. You say ‘it’s a fact’. That means you have evidence. Cough it up, or you are a liar.
He could still be 100% correct-He didn’t say nobody called it that-He said he didn’t know anybody that called it that.
There are also 8-dot versions of Braille:
Braille has been extended to an 8-dot code, particularly for use with braille embossers and refreshable braille displays. In 8-dot braille the additional dots are added at the bottom of the cell, giving a matrix 4 dots high by 2 dots wide. The additional dots are given the numbers 7 (for the lower-left dot) and 8 (for the lower-right dot). Eight-dot braille has the advantages that the case of an individual letter is directly coded in the cell containing the letter and that all the printable ASCII characters can be represented in a single cell. All 256 (28) possible combinations of 8 dots are encoded by the Unicode standard. Braille with six dots is frequently stored as Braille ASCII.
Fair enough, will you denounce the racist fascist that told you to think that the WEF was fascist?
I said the WEF is closer to fascism than socialism, but actually more like techno-authoritarianism, to AGREE WITH the rest of the people saying that the right is stupid to think it’s socialism. Retract what you said and apologize, or you’re a liar.
Hey, I think I’m getting the hang of this.
The same people that try to elevate slight errors to MAJOR LIES, constantly read into my posts the opposite of what I said, because they just assume what I’m going to say based on their assumptions. Then they argue against a straw man, the usual suspects join in also without bothering to read what I actually wrote, and the party goes on.
Like all the people here joining in on the teleconference smear, none of whom know anything about the subject and maybe weren’t even alive then. But they were so sure I needed to be dragged for ‘lying’ that they joined in on the ‘gotcha’.
Nope, you are sounding more stupid, will you denounce your fascist and racist source?
Actually, I thought your pressing on the differences of how you met your wife are not important, really; but you are willing to continue to exaggerate about that because that issue is a distraction to the important one, that is, finding that your feed is not really “scientific”.
I haven’t exaggerated a damned thing. If i wanted to brag about my family I could tell you a hell of a lot more.
Again, you keep making categorical statements about me without evidence. I guess I’ll assume you are a habitual liar.
I also have to say: you said that: “I said the WEF is closer to fascism than socialism” ok. the item stands, not being aware of how you were manipulated by a fascist racist seems to be not important at all to you. Meaning that you will continue to look for reprehensible sources like that one, in the end one should realize that the WEF is not even closer to fascism.
Which read as ‘The right is correct about the WEF, but for the wrong reasons!’ . . . and that’s not AGREEING WITH the rest of the people saying that the right is stupid about this issue.
Who was the fascist racist that manipulated me? You’re making a claim of fact. Identify the person, or retract that.
That would be the right-wing sources that you read but do not browse.
I didn’t make the claim you numb-nuts.
Just another example of you not paying attention or willfully ignoring what others notice from your “ponderings”
“Widdle old innocent” indeed.
I have no idea what you are talking about. I had no idea Richard Hanania was a ‘right wing’ commentartor. And anyway, if he’s a right wing commentator he wouldn’t have been saying that at the WEF. I may have confused him with Yuval Harari, who has spoken at WEF several times.
Wow, kids these days with their extra dots. Why, when I was in school we only had four, unless our onions were properly knotted.
(Thanks, I didn’t know they’d extended the system. Makes perfect sense, too. See, it is possible to learn something in the Pit.)
That too, but we are focusing on Richard Hanania here, baby steps, you know.
The reasoning here is simple, not denouncing him would lead Sam to also realize that what he “thought” about the WEF was not true. But, what is impossible to contemplate by the Sam man.