Spock, is that you? 
Just following Cervaise’s lead.
And we know this isn’t Spock, because there’s not a spec of logic to be found there.
The fact that I confused Richard Hanania with Yuval Harari should tell you that I don’t really know who he is. But let’s leave logic out of this. It’s clearly not your forte’.
Wow, so much conspiracy and ignorance in a few lines, not to mention pumping up the gaslight x1000; really, if it was not known to you, then a different name would had popup in your head. (And one should note here that you made your screed against the WEF based on nothing then). Also: it is clear then that by your own words here, you are admitting to bullshit of the high order, since you are saying that before you type your screeds you are pulling your points from your ass.
That you aware of Yuval, points to how the right wing conspiracy guys are also (By “coincidence” too for sure) targeting him too.
Social media posts have claimed without evidence that leaders of the World Economic Forum (WEF) have said “God is dead” and that they will turn humans into gods.
A video shared online shows a woman citing an article by the website NewsPunch (here), an outlet that has been debunked by Reuters Fact Check in the past. In the video, a woman claims Klaus Schwab, leader of the WEF, said “God is dead” and that “WEF leaders have acquired divine powers to rule over humanity” (here), (here).
She reads another quote from the article that claims, “Klaus Schwab’s right hand man Yuval Noah Harari has announced that the WEF has been so successful in its plans that it is “acquiring divine powers” of “creation and destruction.” She adds that Harari “promises the WEF will turn humans into Gods.”
Yann Zopf, a spokesperson for the WEF said that neither the WEF and nor Klaus Schwab ever made such a declaration. Moreover, Yuval Noah Harari is not working for the WEF and is not “Klaus Schwab’s right-hand man,” Zopf said, adding that the existence of a bio of Harari on the WEF’s website “simply means he attended one of our events, but he is not at all working for our organization.” (here).
Yep, what a coincidence that you had to involve Harari, when he would not be known much, unless he had been the target of the same feeds that you claim you are not aware of.
BTW do you have Harari talking about “people not owning anything in the future” in the context of your screed? Since nothing is coming from that, the only option left is that you are aware of him based on what the reprehensibles told you.
One more thing: Harari shows up also in a video whose content misrepresented what the WEF was saying? Yeah Sam, you are just in favor of what the bullies of the internet are oozing around.
Hey asshole! That isn’t the issue, I don’t care if you called it ‘glory’. I just want to know how your future wife was in earshot of your glory and how you saw her perk up like you were old friends through your text-only glory, capisce?
I’m taking bets on the final line of defense being taking one from the DrDeez playbook and declaring we are all slandering his wife by pointing out that he’s told three contradictory tales of how they met.
No, his ultimate fallback position is that posters on this board are driving people towards suicide.
I assume I was talking about a user mert, but I don’t remember. I might have also changed some minor details to help hide who we actually are, but I don’t remember that either. That’s the honest truth.
And I think you know that memory can be fallible. We’re talking about events that happened 35 years ago. Might I have misremembered something trivial? Sure. Just like everyone else. But the broad steokes are correct.
And now I’d like to stop talking about my family, and I’d like you all to stop as well. You want to keep calling me a liar, go for it. Whatever tickles your fancy. But let’s stop talking about my wife and child, please.
You first.
Don’t bring up your wife or kid in your made up moral fables. No one is going to bring them up.
If you’re going to use your personal experience to bolster your positions, your personal life is going to be discussed. Especially if they are both extremely implausible and extremely convenient to the point you’re making.
Plumbing new depths of how reprehensible you want to be in the Pit, I see.
All of this is to try to prove my ‘lies’ about my own life, that none of you know anything about. This is epic trolling behaviour, and I’ll repeat that you should be ashamed for trying to hound and torment other members like this. It is maddening to be told you are lying about your own life by people who have never met you.
And it’s really shitty to accuse someone of lying when you have no fucking idea if they actually are or not, and none of you do.
If I wanted to waste a mod’s time, I could send them all the proof needed to show that every single thing I said was true, and they could tell you without revealing details. But that would be a lot of work, and frankly you don’t deserve it for this weak-ass nonsense.
So there we go.
You told a story and got the details wrong. You misremembered. Your memory, like everyone’s can be fallible. Absolutely - we all do this from time to time.
If you had said this at the beginning, there would have been NO MORE DISCUSSION. Your insistence on being right about EVERYthing, ALL the time is has a lot to do with your issues here. When in a hole, stop digging. And then don’t blame others because you’re in a deep hole that you mostly dug yourself. (while handing out shovels to others)
You have to remember that all we know about your life comes directly from posts you’ve made here. So, hopefully you can understand the issue when you go into a thread about internet relationships and tell us that you met your wife on the internet. Then in a thread about Warren Zevon, you said that you met her when she overheard you talking about Warren Zevon. Then in a pit thread where you’re calling everyone bullies, you met her when she was being bullied.
You’re using these stories to make your point, which is fine, but you can’t fault us doing our due diligence and making sure we have everything correct before acting on it. Again, this started because I thought you had taken a different stand on bullying in an earlier thread and I wanted to refresh my memory. It wasn’t you and I didn’t make the point I was going to make, since it would have been wrong. But that’s how I found these posts.
How angry would you be if I had made the (incorrect) point I was going to make without checking first?
On top of everything else, this keeps happening to you because you have a pattern of doing it, as shown by a long, long history of pit threads accusing you of pretty much the same thing. Start posting with some integrity and people will treat you as if you have some.
I’m going to go out on a limb and tell you that if I had made those three posts about how I met my (now ex) wife and someone found them, a half-assed ‘meh, it was a long time ago, I probably misremembered parts of it’ would probably be the end of it. But I don’t have a history of making things up to prove my point.
It is more funny when one considers that the point he is trying to demonstrate by talking about his family only showed that standing to bullies then was forgotten too, the real bullies making up things in videos about what they hate (regardless how how they or their targets are named) should be rejected, but we know that would go against his screeds. So, it dig down it is. No matter if bullies did give him the shovel.
I don’t think we’ve seen his final form yet. Wait, here it comes:
Called it. We’re not talking about your wife and child. We’re talking about the stories you’ve told us about your wife and child and how they are contradictory.
Yes, memory can indeed be fallible, and we can even create false memories. However, claiming that the broad strokes are correct when in one story you met your wife face to face and in the other two versions you first met her in text chat is completely absurd. They’re not even creating art in the same medium for fucks sake. They are mutually contradictory, and your continued attempt to claim there is no contradiction is sadly par for the course when it comes to your reliability about pretty much anything. You’re a serial liar.
You have shown that the name of an article was changed, but you didn’t provide anything to back up your claim of why they changed it.
I can’t even find any evidence of a removed video besides your claims, but I may have missed it.
How the fuck are we supposed to get that from this?
It had already been, very clearly, established in the other thread that the phrase you are so desperate to put in Klaus Schwab’s mouth was not anyone’s actual position.
You now should know it isn’t true, but you threw the smear at Klaus Schwab anyway you can’t be bothered to actually find citations for your accusations and it’s pathetic. Liar.
Around the time of Sam’s unhinged screed, I pointed at what Reuters found about the most likely video that Sam did see that reported on what the ‘fascist’ WEF was doing, I noted then that the “deep dives” that Sam told us that he did are not very deep or thorough, as is usual with him.
I mean, he was searching for the names that he thought it fitted, the one that taught him that dumb spin about the WEF, but he did not even get that correctly.
I have to say that I did not want to point at the Bitcom scammer that pushed that misinterpretation about the WEF, but I wanted to see if Sam actually bothered to check the cites that we offer. As usual, Sam did not bother.
The unique thought processes detailed here are worthy of a case report in Brain and Cognition.*
*a real journal, but it’s doubtful their peer reviewers would believe a case like this was for real.
You guys know that I also read people on the right, yes? I have said that many times. So it’s bizarre to me that you’d think that my having heard the name of aome right wing guy makes me a disciple or something. Really, that’s just a smear.
It’s also bizarre that you think trying to understand where both sides are coming from is some sort of sign of… something bad, I guess. I’m not really sure, but you all get very worked up when I mention someone on the right, as if it’s some big secret that you discovered. Listening to all sides is a feature, not a bug. If you think it’s outrageous to listen to what the other side has to say, that says more about you than me.
Look, I’ve stepped oout of P&E and given you your safe space. Now would you please stop with this insane pitting bullshit? It’s a giant waste of time. I’m sure there are actual Republicans out there you can hate on.
Of course, I knew from the start that this,
was just you gaslighting us!
You read right-wing sites but you don’t browse them!
These are the fine distinctions that we don’t appreciate enough. That’s why we can never understand the tribulations we cause poor Sam.