It would seem to be all your’n. They do have poopaganda, but that sounds so much less, uh, um, elegant.
I’m sure the “w” was in error:
There have been some anti-NATO protests in Europe this year, but they seem to have a strong pro-Russia theme to them for reasons I couldn’t possibly speculate on. It’s certainly not a big grassroots thing.
Yes, a few and not huge.
I found that there are several youtube videos with exactly @Sam_Stone 's word choise in the title. I guess they are Russian propaganda, for I have certainly not seen anything in the news.
I’ve learned many things at this site from many intelligent people, and I’ve seen many statements of “fact” challenged and debunked by those same intelligent people. Cites are expected when claims of fact are made, and that is so people can check and challenge more easily.
You have an aura of superiority about you. Frankly, I get the distinct feeling that it is undeserved.
Are you talking about Sam or BKB? Genuinely not sure.
I was responding to the quote I listed from BKB. Sorry I was unclear! 
In Norway there has been some kneejerk anti-NATO Russia apologetics in the furthest red and anti-NATO wings, but the larger socialist party has finally removed replacing NATO with a Nordic defense union from their platform.
And no protests of mentionable size.
Interestingly, you criticized BeepKillBeep for stating that Sam Stone makes a lot of factual errors on this site… Right after it was pointed out that Sam made yet another factual error with no citation.
Good timing /s
Actually, I wasn’t because I didn’t connect the thread title with this:
You make a lot of factual errors on this site. I’m not going to list them.
I thought he meant “you” in the plural sense, as in ALL of us. Again, mea culpa. LOL
ahhhh. Never mind!
Don’t be grumpy. It’s Friday! 
“Ahhhh” as in “enlightened noise”, not as in “grumpy frustration”
Yay! LOL
It’s Find Fault Friday!
Sam wants to know if new facts changed @JohnT 's political opinion.
Hilarious.
If there wasn’t something there, @JohnT wouldn’t have been asking questions in the first place, after all. I mean, we have the sign. We have the yard. How can we be sure Republicans didn’t steal a yard sign? I’m going to wait until the evidence is finally analyzed before jumping to any biased partisan conclusions about sign tampering.
And now in the thread about the classified docs in Biden’s private office in P&E @Sam_Stone has misrepresented the facts in a way that I don’t see as any different than flat out lying. The post in question is here. Each of the “examples” he offers are far more egregious and intentional than what we currently know about the Biden situation. In particular the first one he offers concerning Elizabeth Jo Shirley who was sentenced to 97 months in prison is seriously bullshit and to me shows he is either a fucking moron who can’t comprehend what he is reading or is a dishonest, lying sack of shit.
@Lance_Turbo does an excellent job pointing out the dishonesty in his repsonse here.
This guy needs to seriously fuck off.
He’s not a moron.
his mental function is less than stellar