This is the saddest thing I have ever read on the Dope.
Where does your link say there are pictures of Hunter smoking crack and waving his handgun around?
Where does your link say the Oversight Committee has validated any evidence?
Again, what evidence is on the laptop against Hunter and maybe others?
The congressional investigations have failed to find any evidence that wasn’t already being used by DOJ to prosecute Hunter. They didn’t need the laptop because nothing of significance has been found on it. Unless of course you are talking about the congressional investigations into Joe Biden which are 100000% bogus.
Next time come back with actual evidence, not Comer committee talking points.
And look up the definition of pathetic troll. Pretty sure you’ll find a picture of yourself.
Read for context.
The mission of this Board is to fight ignorance.
We have a member who acts in direct opposition to that mission.
However, it is not the mods job to determine what is ignorance, nor is it their job to fight it.
It is ours.
Therefore, if we… the ignorance fighters… determine that one among us is acting in direct opposition to the Boards mission and, as a group, overwhelmingly determine this person to be unrepentant in their violation of this mission and can provide years of cites proving this, the mods…
- … should ignore the evidence and allow the individual unfettered posting privileges on all topics
- … should not ignore the evidence and topic-ban the individual
- … should not ignore the evidence and ban the individual outright
0
voters
(Poll 1 results are private)
Person 1 has a son. The son violates the rules of the community, in a manner which implicates… however indirectly… the father.
Should Person 1 be held responsible for the sins of the son?
- Yes, President Stone should be held accountable for the actions of Hunter Stone
- No, President Stone should not be held accountable for the actions of Hunter Stone
0
voters
(Poll 2 responses are public.)
On the contrary, it’s rare to see somebody exercise such transparent, illuminating self awareness. It took 1700 posts but the guy finally got to the core of his issues.
Jeez, cut Sammy a break, didn’t you read? He doesn’t need to know what the evidence was, he just has to believe it’s there and consists of pictures of Hunter smoking crack and waving his handgun around and presto, that’s what it is, and Biden Crime Family evidence to boot! Again, he’s doing Ayn Rand proud by demonstrating that he understands her philosophy that belief in things is what matters, not evidence or facts.
It’s been quite a few years since I read it, but I’m going to say that was the core message of John Galt’s 60-page long speech. Here, I’ll even link to it to prove I’m right. Just don’t expect me to read my cite or anything, I’m doing things using the Sammy school of debate. If for some bizarre reason it turns out I’m wrong, it’s because I’ve misstated what my cite actually says, not because I know it isn’t what it says and am lying.
From the Twitter thread:
Sam hasn’t responded to this yet. Any guesses what he’ll do?
- ignore it and pretend he never made this claim
- provide a link to something that doesn’t support his statement
- “I don’t need to link to information everyone already knows, you’re only asking because I’m conservative”
- cite some made up number that Musk tweeted
- shift the goalposts, e.g., “the total number of users who ever registered on Twitter is always increasing”
- apologize for making shit up
(Option 6 is just a joke.)
(Option 6 is just a joke, but it would help to prove that he’s from Canada.)
I wonder why, if there are pictures of Hunter Biden smoking crack and waving a gun around, they haven’t been published like the dick pics.
It would be much more significant, I guess most of us assumed that Hunter possess a dick.
I’d vote for topic bans, as long as narrowly defined. “Sam is banned from discussing U.S. presidential politics” is too broad; SCOTUS will end up overturning on appeal.
Seriously, though, a topic ban like “Hunter’s laptop” would head off a lot of shit. Every time I see Sam post, yet again, “And yet no one has apologized to me for being right about Hunter’s laptop,” I grind my teeth and roll my eyes in anticipation of 100 posts of the same old debunked bullshit and angry rebuttals.
I saw that there were 43 unread messages in this thread and I immediately thought “Sam has discovered the smoking gun on Hunter’s laptop” This time for sure!
“It is raining outside right now!”
(After looking out the window) “Uh…not, it isn’t. What are you talking about?”
“I was right all along! Rain does exist!”
Amazing, folks. Apparently saying I’m making fun of him in the pit is admitting to trolling.
Way to bolster my opinion of your integrity there.
No no. If it turns out your cite does not say what you claim, this means that everyone is against you, and is picking on you because of your political beliefs.
That letter is 100% true. You didn’t give it enough credibility.
I just spent five minutes searching, and couldn’t find anything other than his penis, and some nice shots of him with a beautiful woman on a beach.
He was smoking what appeared to be a cigarette in one photo.
Of course, the main point is nothing significant about the President has been found on Hunter’s laptop.
At this point it reminds me of this exchange:
Chalmers: Why is there smoke coming out of your oven, Seymour?
Skinner: Uh… ooh! That isn’t smoke, it’s steam! Steam from the steamed clams we’re having. Mmmm, steamed clams!
Skinner: Superintendent, I hope you’re ready for mouthwatering hamburgers.
Chalmers: I thought we were having steamed clams.
Skinner: Oh no, I said ‘steamed hams’. That’s what I call hamburgers.
Chalmers: You call hamburgers ‘steamed hams’?
Skinner: Yes! It’s a regional dialect.
Chalmers: Uh-huh. Eh, what region?
Skinner: Uh…upstate New York.
Chalmers: Really? Well I’m from Utica and I’ve never heard anyone use the phrase ‘steamed hams’.
Skinner: Oh, not in Utica, no. It’s an Albany expression.
Chalmers: I see.
[Chalmers takes a bite out of a burger and chews it a little, while Skinner sips his drink.]
Chalmers: You know, these hamburgers are quite similar to the ones they have at Krusty Burger.
Skinner: Hohoho, no! Patented Skinner Burgers. Old family recipe!
Chalmers: For steamed hams?
Skinner: Yes.
Chalmers: Yes, and you call them steamed hams, despite the fact they are obviously grilled.
Skinner: Y- Uh… you know, the… One thing I should… excuse me for one second.
Chalmers: Of course.
[Skinner enters and leaves the kitchen swiftly upon seeing it is now on fire]
Skinner: [yawns] Well, that was wonderful. A good time was had by all. I’m pooped.
Chalmers: Yes, I should be–good lord, what is happening in there?!
Skinner: Aurora Borealis?
Chalmers: Ah- Aurora Borealis?! At this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, localized entirely within your kitchen?!
Skinner: Yes.
Chalmers: …May I see it?
Skinner: …No.
Let’s be fair - nobody so perfidious that his son owns a laptop could possibly be an honest, law-abiding citizen. I mean there could be naughty pictures on that thing!
A reminder that the lies were about what you keep accusing others of saying back then.
But I see you’ve managed to find some new lies to tell about the laptop.
Picture of Hunter sleeping with a crack pipe in his mouth:
Photo of Hunter Biden smoking crack while driving at high speed:
Photo of Hunter Biden holding his gun while naked, finger on the trigger.
This is the gun that Halle Biden threw into a dumpster because Hunter was acting so irrationally with it.
I’m not sure why you found these so hard to find. They were on the front page of Google when I typed 'Hunter Biden crack photo" and “Hunter Biden Gun photo”
All of this came from the laptop. You know, the one of absolutely no significance.