Yes, when President Hillary Clinton did that, in her official capacity as the head of the executive branch and of the foreign policy of the US, I was indeed outraged.
Then I woke up, and remembered we had that electoral college thingie.
Ah, so you’re ok with US Presidential candidate funneling millions of dollars for fake information about their political opponents from Russian operatives.
What in the holy fuck is wrong with you?? At what point did you decide that there is no difference between right and wrong?
Absolutely. If Mark Sanford or Corey Booker or Amy Klobuchar wants to spend money on hookers and blow, I don’t care. If such a person becomes one of the two major-party candidates, I’ll weigh that along with fifty other considerations, compare this sum total to the other major party’s candidate, and cast my vote accordingly.
What does ANY of this have to do with the current president of this US? Bupkis. Nada. Zilch.
What’s there to reveal? DNC and Clinton campaign funneled millions of dollars to Russian operatives to collect dirt on Clinton’s political enemy. The return on their investment was so pathetic, that only Goebbels-like outlets like Buzzfeed and CNN decided to publish it, while even the hard-code leftist rag like NY Times refused to publish it.
This is my way of referring to Clinton and DNC colluding with Russian officials and paying them millions of dollars to collect dirt on their political opponents.
Why would fake information cost so much? Seems like one could get the real thing for a lot less.
But what point are you trying to make? It’s seems like you are saying that actual President Trump gets an automatic free pass on wrongdoing if it can ever be proven Candidate Clinton did something prosecutable (which seems not to have happened quite yet). Is that correct?