I’m in general agreement here, but I think in a couple of them, specifically “Juggler” and “Oasis Told Us So,” you were pushing toward something novel and good. These two seemed to approach an understanding of the complexity of life and love and such, but then pulled back before they really started to explore it.
To try to give a more constructive take: Most of them are very straightforward and take a pretty simplistic, black-and-white view of the world. Life, and especially romance, are incredibly complex; that’s why people are still creating poems and songs and movies and plays and novels and paintings and sculptures and I-don’t-know-what-all about them after all these millennia.
Also, you use imagery that I’ve seen so often I almost don’t recognize it as metaphor. “Deafening silence,” for example, or anything about “until the stars fall.”
I only read about half of them at random, so for all I know the other half are worthy of Yeats or Tom Waits. Keep plugging at it; the good it does you is in sticking to it, not in creating masterpieces.
That’s my take; there’s promise, but you’re going to have to do a lot of hard work to get it moving.
(A couple of disclaimers:
(1: If you write because you love writing, then for heaven’s sake don’t listen to any of us yahoos. If you want to get published, though, then talk to as many knowledgeable people as you can.
(2: I, and I guess all of us, are reading these as poetry. The rules for writing poetry are totally different from those for writing songs, and we can’t evaluate lyrics without hearing the actual song.)