:rolleyes: Folks, in light of the direction this country’s going, it looks like there’s only one thing I can do.
:Runs naked through thread, promoting the right of Dopers to view naked female bodies, thus displaying full frontal and back-al nudity.:
Actually, if Natalie Portman’s playing a stripper, what difference is getting rid of a nude scene going to make? I could be wrong, but I don’t see much difference between stripping down to almost nothing and stripping down to nothing. If anything, according to some guys I’ve known, almost nothing can be even more provocative than nothing. No, this doesn’t mean I’ll run naked through the thread wearing only high heels and stockings; I’m way to clumsy for that, and I’d probably wind up landing in someone’s lap!
I believe that was Shakespear in Love, if not others. Siege, I find your naivete charming!
My theory is that all men (okay, a large majority, a mandate, even) want to see all women nekkid, at least once. Objectively, I know that there is not a whole lot of difference between naked women (within certain limits, guys, come on!), but if you tell me you have a picture of some woman I haven’t seen naked before, I’m gonna take a look. They haven’t made major changes to the model in the past forever years, but I’m still occasionally going to pay for the privilege of seeing different women starkers (magazines, online, renting Eyes Wide Shut, even though I expect it to stink).
We just have to check everyone off the list, is all.
**Diogenes the Cynic ** I have chastized you a few times in the past for your over the top passion. Allow me to applaud your application of it in this instance. I see my interests in Hollywood are well looked after. Thanks vey much and keep up the good work.
It could be worse. I ran naked through the thread, and apparently elucidator still thinks it’s a males-only thread. I’m going to have to check with a gentleman or two I know in real life and make sure everything’s still where and what it was! :rolleyes:
