I cited an opinion piece that nonetheless contained multiple relevant facts - exact quotes from multiple Republican officials that support my assertion.
You’re continuing to ignore these facts. I’m not sure why - you asked for a cite for my assertion, and I, in good faith, linked to a piece with multiple supporting facts. Why are you unwilling to consider these supporting facts that I provided? It’s a fact that multiple Republican officials said these things.
“The Republican Party, the strategists, the consultants, they firmly believe that early voting is bad for Republican Party candidates,” Greer told The Post. “It’s done for one reason and one reason only. … ‘We’ve got to cut down on early voting because early voting is not good for us,’ ” Greer said he was told by those staffers and consultants.
“The things they had in there were crazy,” Trump said. “They had things — levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”
Ralston’s original comments riled civil rights groups who said he was opposing voting access to benefit his political party’s candidates. He had said in an interview that heavy reliance on voting by mail “will be extremely devastating to Republicans and conservatives.”
“If Republicans don’t challenge and change the U.S. election system, there will never be another Republican president elected again,” Graham said Sunday on Fox News Channel.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton claimed if it hadn’t been for state leadership blocking counties from sending out mass mail-in ballots, former President Donald Trump would have lost the Lone Star State in 2020…
“We would’ve been in the same boat. We would’ve been one of those battleground states that were counting votes in Harris County for three days, and Donald Trump would’ve lost the election,” Paxton said on Steve Bannon’s War Room on Friday.
Stop this nonsense and admit you don’t want to acknowledge the validity of the quotes instead of just dancing around and pretending the sources aren’t good enough for you.
And what in the blue fuck does that have to do with the validity of the quotes? Are you going to claim it’s the author’s opinion that those people said the things attributed to them? That’s not how journalism works.