WTF? Who on Earth is writing this stuff? I think it’s hilarious, but there’s a chance someone could get really and truly offended over the extremely broad and somewhat unflattering generalization.
On a related note, who uses the term `phlegmatic’ anymore? In this context, I think it means calm and unemotional as opposed to full of snot.
I have a feeling it’s going to turn out to be a case of someone having written a “joke” caption for his/her picture, and accidentally sent it to the news bureau instead of the correct one.
Neglected to mention that according the link, it’s an AFP photo, not an AP photo as the thread title says. But again, they could be the same agency for all I know about news bureaus.
Since the date is not April 1, and the site is not The Onion, it looks like that was a gag caption written “in-house” and not intended to be made public. Oops!
They are not. The Associated Press, based in New York, is a non-profit cooperative that’s owned by its members, which consist of about 1,500 U.S. daily newspapers. Agence France-Presse is headquartered in Paris and partly owned by the French government, although the state’s holding has dropped below 50%.
I used it just last night. One of our Fakesgiving guests said she likes the word phlegm, so I asked about phlegmatic. (Man, the people you meet…) I think she likes the original better. And you’re right about the definition.
I’ve noticed the photo captions are frequently copied from a (sometimes tangentially) related article; usually, Yahoo’s AP and AFP photos will be accompanied by a link to that story, like this (the one that I suspect should have appeared next to this particular photo):
The photo from the OP seems to have expired, but after perusing the article, it seems like the caption really should have borrowed the last few lines instead of the opening sentence from the article. To wit: