In this culture, it’s not unusual to hear people proclaim that folks are their most attractive in their 20s, but a lot of people, including actors and actresses simply don’t look complete that young. I thought of this while watching Haunted a few days ago - compare how Kate Beckinsale looks in Much Ado About Nothing to how she looks in Underworld. IMHO she’s far prettier now than when she was in her early twenties.
This happens with the gents too. Joshua Jackson as Pacey Witter vs Joshua Jackson as Peter Bishop. Alexander Skarsgard in Zoolander (sorry, can’t find a better pic from this movie) vs True Blood. Peter Facinelli in Foxfire (also hard to find pics from) vs Fastlane…
I’m not the only one to have this opinion about some actors and actresses, right? So who else?
I’d recommend caution in assuming that an actor’s appearance in any particular movie or photograph is characteristic of his/her “real” looks. Makeup, lighting, and wardrobe can do a great deal to make someone look better, worse, or even more immature, as I suspect is the case with the OP’s first picture of Beckinsale. Although there’s about 13 years between the two pictures, that’s not to say you couldn’t find a picture of her in 1993 that makes her look a lot better than a current photo.
Jennifer Connelly’s “emaciated” phase kinda peaked between Mulholland Falls (1996) and A Beautiful Mind (2001). I was first aware of her in 1991 (Career Opportunities, age 21), when she was unparallelledly stunning, and she’s looking terrific again now.
Lea Thompson (b. 1961) sure looked better in Beverly Hillbillies (1993) than in Some Kind of Wonderful (1987).
I think another note of caution is needed here - pictures taken now will be with a “look” that is fashionable now … pictures taken ten years ago have ten-year-old fashions, and will probably automatically look “worse” to a lot of people.
There’s also the effect of extra care being taken as the person gets more famous. The Tina Fey shots upthread are a perfect example … you’re comparing a grainy high school snap to a profesionally styled/lit/posed shot of today - not apples to apples.
I don’t think women tend to change much in underlying looks between 20 and 30. Guys are a bit different - I agree some of the “young” shots of guys in this thread have them looking not fully adult, which means not so good in a guy.
My Google-Fu is weak today, but all the photos I’ve seen of her from college until she joined the SNL performing cast did not look glamorous. Feel free to prove me wrong.