OMG, Adaher really is a full-blown out and out racist. I mean, I always thought he had cognitive difficulties and was wrong about practically everything but there were times when I thought he might be a misguided but halfway decent human being.
(all bolding in this thread is mine)
Then this morning I stumbled on this gem in a hijack of the Hillary Clinton thread,
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=18251951&postcount=107
[QUOTE=Adaher]
What I don’t agree with is that gay rights can be used as a pretext to go after freedoms the original Civil Rights Act didn’t go after. I don’t think the public will go for that.
[/QUOTE]
I want to hear more. I want to hear ALL about the “freedoms” the 1964 Civil Rights Act “went after”. I am especially interested in hearing the stories of how the Civil Rights Act of 1964 negatively impacted Adaher.
He has also been on an kick lately regarding the right of independent contractors to discriminate based on race–He mistakenly thinks they have one. Here’s where he talks about how he thinks it’s legal and perfectly OK for businesses like repairmen and contractors to refuse to work for black customers because they scare people.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=18244306&postcount=20507
[QUOTE=Adaher]
Their places of business, should they have them, are public accommodations. The services they provide outside that building are not. Part of the issue is personal safety and the right to feel safe doing your job. A public accommodation is public, so there’s a certain measure of safety. But when you have a job that requires you to come into people’s neighborhoods and homes, you have the right to refuse service, even if it’s because of their race. We’re never going to get to the point where we force people to do things that scare them. that’s one area where freedom of association outweighs the right to not be discriminated against.
[/QUOTE]
And here’s that good old conservative fear again, he actually claims that that there is a “scared shitless” exception to the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=18246106&postcount=20554
[QUOTE=Adaher]
Actually, taxi drivers and delivery drivers of any sort can claim safety fears. The law gives people having to go places tremendous latitude in determining what they believe to be safe and unsafe, even if this has a hugely disproportionate effect on African-Americans. There does seem to be an “I’m scared shitless” exception to the CRA. Which is why black people complain about not being able to hail a cab, but no one actually does anything about it.
[/QUOTE]
And in this one he concedes that why it may be technically illegal for a cab driver to refuse to pick up a black passenger, he claims the law isn’t enforced because somehow “everyone” knows that cab drivers that pick up black passengers risk being murdered.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=18246507&postcount=20565
[QUOTE=Adaher]
No. But let’s be real, the neighborhoods are being denied because they are black neighborhoods.
However, governments are generally reluctant to enforce civil rights law to make people do things they believe are dangerous, and where their belief is backed up by facts. Cab drivers in particular are frequently victims of violent crime. So although there are complaints about their racial profiling, the government is never actually going to do anything about it. The fastest way to turn the public against anti-discrimination laws would be a crying widow saying, "The government made my husband pick that murderer up!" So it’s just not done. Prosecutorial discretion, you see
[/QUOTE]
I could probably do this all day but I don’t want to hog all the fun.