Today I went to a pawnshop. In the clearance corner, behind a glass case, next to old CD players and alarm clocks, was two MP3 players. One was $20, and the other was eight. This was the eight dollar model. It had no earphones, belt-clips, or usb cable, so I asked them to hold it for me, and went to a nearby radio shack to see if the cable was easily available, or propriety. Turns out it is freely available. (usb mini-a) Good. I then went and looked up a review of it. It can change out it’s memory, which is good, but it uses propriety software, which is bad. Ah well, it would be worth it at $8 bucks. (btw, the $20 model wasn’t worth it)
So, when I went to buy the item, the manager refused to sell it to me at that price. He explained that someone screwed up by labeling it at that price, and “generously” offered to sell it to me at $70.
Ha. For $50, I could buy the newer model. I pointed out that when some item is priced by an employee, the store is honor bound to sell it at that price. (or so I have been told. Also, I know that is not the case when the price tag form one item is one a diffrent item. This was not applicable of this case.) No go. My triumph turned to ashes in my mouth. I left, determined to look up the relevant law, and look how much it would cost to buy a simular model. (I have dione so, mostly.)
Anyway, I was wondering two different things. One: What is the law about this in MD, when an item has a sticker that the manager does not think reflects reality. Isn’t he duty bound, or am I misremembering? This and This older thread partially answers my question, but not completely.
Also, what are some posters experience in the wild, wacky world of mislabel prices. Any major triumphs? Defeats?
P.S. I have heard about, ‘invitation to treat’, but that seems to be an Australian law.