Affirmed:Lenin really is the tits

[adhay]

… no matter what you might say about his domestic heavy-handedness. Lenin, 40+ years before Ike and without the benefit of Ike’s hindsight on (and singular involvement in) WWII along with the obvious results of that war in turning our large domestic producers into weapons manufacturers, he nails the root of Ike’s Military-Industrial Complex.

From the Preface of his little pamphlet written 1916.
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/

I trust that this pamphlet will help the reader to understand the fundamental economic question, that of the economic essence of imperialism, for unless this is studied, it will be impossible to understand and appraise modern war and modern politics.

I started here. Chapter V. DIVISION OF THE WORLD AMONG CAPITALIST ASSOCIATIONS. Lenin: 1916/imp-hsc: V. DIVISION OF THE WORLD AMONG CAPITALIST ASSOCIATIONS

Monopolist capitalist associations, cartels, syndicates and trusts first divided the home market among themselves and obtained more or less complete possession of the industry of their own country. But under capitalism the home market is inevitably bound up with the foreign market. Capitalism long ago created a world market. As the export of capital increased, and as the foreign and colonial connections and “spheres of influence” of the big monopolist associations expanded in all ways, things “naturally” gravitated towards an international agreement among these associations, and towards the formation of international cartels.

This is a new stage of world concentration of capital and production, incomparably higher than the preceding stages. Let us see how this supermonopoly develops. …

Facinating shit.

Lenin is the tits.

[wmfellows]

Are you serious?

[adhay]

@wmfellows

Are you serious?

You tell me.

Here’s a further quote from the Preface.

… the monopolies have never pursued the aim, nor have they had the result, of benefiting the consumer, or even of handing over to the state part of the promoter’s profits; they have served only to facilitate, at the expense of the state, the recovery of private industries which were on the verge of bankruptcy.

Sounds nuts, I know.

[Sage_Rat]

Yes, the horror that nations should cooperate with foreign nations and form binding commercial ties. That might encourage peace. Much better than that is to operate on your own and eschew all possibilities of commerce arising on its own. Instead, one must control all commercial endeavors centrally and slay everyone who is too lazy to work or who holds opposing ideas, and to encourage and finance other nations to do the same.

Mass murder over Peace and Commerce! Viva la Revolution my brothers!

[Der_Trihs]

@adhay

… no matter what you might say about his domestic heavy-handedness. Lenin, 40+ years before Ike and without the benefit of Ike’s hindsight on (and singular involvement in) WWII along with the obvious results of that war in turning our large domestic producers into weapons manufacturers, he nails the root of Ike’s Military-Industrial Complex.

Um, so what?

What next? “Whatever you say about Jeffrey Dahmer’s eating habits, he played a mean game of poker.”

[wmfellows]

@adhay

You tell me.

Here’s a further quote from the Preface.Sounds nuts, I know.

Sounds superficial and simplistic. We also know how the implementation of Leninism actually went.

Mate, George Orwell went through this a few years ago.

ETA, Also rather fail to see how this in some way links with your President Eisenhower’s observation in any real way.

[Sitnam]

Ike warned about future developments sprung from the current situation in his own country, Lenin’s screed against capitalism is as spot on as Nostradamus prophecies.

[Fear_Itself]

@Der_Trihs

What next? “Whatever you say about Jeffrey Dahmer’s eating habits, he played a mean game of poker.”

If my goal was to win at poker, I would be a fool not to read up on how Dahmer did it.

[adhay]

Jeeez. Please no more about Leninism. I’m not a Leninist and I’m not into armed revolution or killing millions of indigenous folks in the process. That’s today’s corporate policy, if you haven’t noticed, not to mention our own thru the years.

I am saying that his analysis of global corporate capitalism/imperialism is spot on. You find something specific in my cite you’d like to dispute, let me know. Otherwise, check it at the door.

[Der_Trihs]

@adhay

Jeeez. Please no more about Leninism.

<points at title of thread>

if you didn’t want to talk about Lenin, you did it wrong.

[DanBlather]

This is why the standard of living has been going down all around the world. We live shorter lives than before and have less creature comforts. Meanwhile the number of people killed in international war is at an all time high. Unlike Lenin’s time the borders of countries are changing constantly. It’s a real mess I tell you.

[Slithy_Tove]

@Fear_Itself

If my goal was to win at poker, I would be a fool not to read up on how Dahmer did it.

He really knew what was in the other guy’s hand.

[Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor]

@Sage_Rat

Yes, the horror that nations should cooperate with foreign nations and form binding commercial ties. That might encourage peace.

HA!-HA!-HA!

As I have often pointed out on the SDMB, Germany & France have always enjoyed the closest commercial relationships, & see how well that worked out for them!

:smack:

[Sage_Rat]

@Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor

HA!-HA!-HA!

As I have often pointed out on the SDMB, Germany & France have always enjoyed the closest commercial relationships, & see how well that worked out for them!

:smack:

Hitler was a moron. The US is a generally peaceful nation and yet under Bush II we took over two foreign countries. Blaming the act of an idiot on the local economics is rather short-sighted.

Humans are still humans no matter what. The question is what works better, since you’re probably never going to find the perfect solution.

[Sam_Stone]

“Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?”

[adhay]

@Sage_Rat

Hitler was a moron. The US is a generally peaceful nation and yet under Bush II we took over two foreign countries. Blaming the act of an idiot on the local economics is rather short-sighted. …

Hitler was a capitalist hack hired to drive the Jews (many Socialist leaning) out of Europe. IBM provided the automated card readers that made Hitler so efficient is his appointed task. The US is an overtly peaceful nation except when it’s not.

Here’s Lenin on anti-semitism. History of the Jews in Russia - Wikipedia

Lenin was intrigued with technology and in 1919 recorded eight of his speeches on gramophone records. Only seven of these were later re-recorded and put on sale. The one suppressed in the Khrushchev era recorded Lenin’s feelings on antisemitism.:

The Tsarist police, in alliance with the landowners and the capitalists, organized pogroms against the Jews. The landowners and capitalists tried to divert the hatred of the workers and peasants who were tortured by want against the Jews. … Only the most ignorant and downtrodden people can believe the lies and slander that are spread about the Jews. … It is not the Jews who are the enemies of the working people. The enemies of the workers are the capitalists of all countries. Among the Jews there are working people, and they form the majority. They are our brothers, who, like us, are oppressed by capital; they are our comrades in the struggle for socialism. Among the Jews there are kulaks, exploiters and capitalists, just as there are among the Russians, and among people of all nations… Rich Jews, like rich Russians, and the rich in all countries, are in alliance to oppress, crush, rob and disunite the workers… Shame on accursed Tsarism which tortured and persecuted the Jews. Shame on those who foment hatred towards the Jews, who foment hatred towards other nations.

[Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor]

@Sage_Rat

Hitler was a moron. The US is a generally peaceful nation and yet under Bush II we took over two foreign countries. Blaming the act of an idiot on the local economics is rather short-sighted.

Humans are still humans no matter what. The question is what works better, since you’re probably never going to find the perfect solution.

How about the Kaiser?
Or the King of Prussia?

[Tapioca_Dextrin]

If Lenin really was the tits, does it mean he was bird brained?

[Grumman]

@adhay

Hitler was a capitalist hack hired to drive the Jews (many Socialist leaning) out of Europe.

Do you have the slightest piece of evidence to back up this claim, or is this just another excuse to blame everything on the capitalist pig-dogs?

Who hired him? For how much?

[adhay]

@Grumman

Do you have the slightest piece of evidence to back up this claim, or is this just another excuse to blame everything on the capitalist pig-dogs?

Who hired him? For how much?

You are a Wildcat, aren’t you?

Hitler was able to rearm with the help of Western corporations and the connivance of the post-Lenin USSR. Prescott Bush was Hitler’s US banker. IBM, mentioned above. Ford successfully sued the US govt for the allied inflicted damages to it’s truck factory in Vichy France. Cites? Use your own google-fu and dispel your own ignorance.