http://www.greenvilleonline.com/news/2002/11/19/2002111931890.htm
First of all, I am not making light of the crime (a murder) described in the article linked above. I am just trying to figure out how in the world the suspect concluded that his actions following the crime constituted a sound game plan. The facts:
- Suspect murders victim with a hammer
- Suspect wraps body of victim in an air mattress
- Suspect proceeds to drag body from the crime scene (an apartment complex) and take it across Pelham Road (a very heavily traveled road, even at 3:30 AM)
- Witnesses see suspect struggling with the “bundle” as he crosses Pelham Road; stop and ask if suspect needs assistance (he declines, witnesses move on)
- After crossing Pelham Road, suspect dumps body under a house on trailer at a construction site
- Sensing something fishy, witnesses return to area and discover the body
- Police called to scene; crack team of investigators follow trail of blood (left by victim’s body as it was dragged) across the road, into the apartment complex, and RIGHT UP TO THE SUSPECT’S FRONT DOOR!
Any of you defense attorneys out there care to take on this one (pro bono, of course)?
Anybody else have a Stupid Criminal Story they would like to share?