Please, everyone: instead of just saying, “My goodness, how ignorant you are,” can you go into some detail on why? Just saying, “That’s wrong” doesn’t help us learn. Take the additional step of putting down what the correct answers are.
As far as I can tell, his answers were fine. He may not be the one who flunked.
Minor little thing known as fact shows that I didn’t flunk those subjects. Now, admittedly, the USA’s government that existed prior to the current constitution came into effect was ineffective and unworkable; however, that’s not the point. The point is that the USA as a country was in existence before that constitution came into effect.
You may or may not agree with the gist but this is an interesting narrative on how Netanyahu used the Israeli boys death to best advantage, and led us to here:
Correct, and even before the Articles of Confederation. The United States declared their collective independence from the United Kingdom in 1776, and immediately began combined military, diplomatic, economic etc activities. A formal framework for this didn’t get established until the 1776 AoC, but some countries (the United Kingdom for example) have been without a strict framework for ages. The United States itself claims 1776 as its founding year, and since they decided to fight about it, and the U.S. won, back when it happened, there’s also broad international recognition of this.
You do not need a constitution at all to exist as a country/state. Most European States that were founded as Kingdoms in the early middle ages did not have constitutions for generations, Britain still doesn’t have a single, formalized “written” one.
Further, every other country founded by a colonial independence movement, the date of the country’s declared independence is almost always what is recognized as the beginning of that country as an independent State. Countries that didn’t have a true independence “movement”, like Canada, are recognized as having been a mostly independent but “subordinate” state for long before true independence.
The assumption is that they’ve been shot and removed from the scene and need medical attention. Writing the kids off would have been unthinkable until verified.
Moving on to the rockets fired, no nation is going to put up with that nonsense.
In 1776, there were 13 united American colonies who had gathered together and declared their independence from British rule.
You refer to “the USA’s government” as if it actually existed before it was created.
In the 1776 Declaration of Independence, the representatives of the 13 colony’s individual governments did not identify themselves as the United States of America. They did referred to themselves as:
the 13 united States of America,
the “good People of these Colonies”,
“these United Colonies”,
and as “FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES”.
That doesn’t sound as if they thought of themselves as a singular United States of America, does it?
Right, gunfire in order to wounded three boys individually, and then singing to celebrate the wounding of the three - is this confirmed by political spokesman or does it come out of your head?
I ask because (a) the author seems pretty well connected (b) you don’t, and (c) I’m not aware of any Israeli Gov official refuting the narrative described, inc. Netanyahu’s decision to use the deaths to his advantage.
Until they find them it’s a rescue mission. This is not even a discussion point.
The author seems pretty well connected to who, the killers?
And once the deaths are confirmed how is the response going to be any different? Hamas has gone to the well of terrorism one too many times. They need to go.
Yes, they knew the kids were dead and kept the relatives in false hope for political reasons.
Meanwhile the NBC reporter who saw the four children blown to bits on the beach has been withdrawn, with his producer, and replaced by staff carefully chosen to make sure they don’t speak Arabic. A CNN reporter has also been reassigned because she criticised some Israelis who were cheering the bombing of Gazan civilians and were also issuing death threats against herself.