So are you allowed to throw a hand grenade at me even though I am surrounded by people just walking by or hiding from me?
I think Israel is justified in killing as many members of Al-Qassam Brigades - Wikipedia and any that are providing them with material aid or comfort. But there are limits to what you are allowed to do to defend yourself.
It may be that we don’t disagree on this and my post is just a clarification of your position, but I have seen internet rants putting all Palestinians in the same boat as the guys firing the rockets. For example in this thread, I have seen Palestinians=Hamas more than a few times.
[QUOTE=Damuri Ajashi]
So are you allowed to throw a hand grenade at me even though I am surrounded by people just walking by or hiding from me?
[/QUOTE]
Well, let’s say that Hamas represents the gun men. They are surrounded by a crowd of people. Some of them innocent victims, some of them are in the gang, and some of them just support the gang and what they are doing. The gun men are firing at the large extended family of the police but they are terrible shots. So, whenever the gun men shoot, the police shoot back (instead of ACTUALLY throwing hand grenades), and unfortunately people in the crowd get hit.
Er…this analogy is getting a bit wooly (and this is a feature, not a bug). Instead of all of the above, let’s say you built a large wooden badger instead…
What do you mean by “the past”? The creation of Israel occurred at about the same time as many countries in Europe got their present borders, India/Pakistan, not to mention before decolonization in much of the 3rd world (which created scads of ethno-nationalist states).
The notion that the creation of Israel was a unique and uniquely modern event never ceases to puzzle me.
I agree that there are limits. Just War theory states that the risks to civilians must be proportional to the legitimate military objectives being pursued.
Israel would not be justifed if it took a WW2 approach to Hamas, and simply bombed Gaza flat. To its credit, it isn’t doing that.
In Los Angeles, a man stood in a window with a baby in one arm…and a gun in his other hand. He shot at police officers. They shot back. The baby was killed.
By law, the man is responsible for the death of the child. He is the murderer, not the policeman.
Israeli writer Yochanan Gordon:“When Genocide Is Permissible.” Posted on the Times of Israel website, which shortly took it down, but you can still read the article at the latter link. It’s not clear whether he’s advocating genocide on all Palestinians or all Gazans or just members of Hamas – in fact, he seems to blur the distinction.
Plus in the grenade example you’re acting out of proportion and unnecessarily, because a rifle is far more accurate than a grenade in any case and against a single target at distance has a greater likelihood of being effective.
Doesn’t really compare to persons launching high explosive projectiles that could conceivably kill many people being targeted even though targeting them may kill some civilians on the other side.
Your quote does not even mention Israel. If you were trying to be coherent but still refused to just post the damn English translation, you should have at least chosen a sentence that says what incident they are condemning.
It’s not the primary source. The White House is the primary source, and you could have made things a lot easier by not taking a single sentence in a foreign language out of context and pretending that is an argument.
Your quote supports Terr. The newspaper correctly stated that the White House said X. Whether or not the White House was correct to say X is irrelevant - the newspaper was correctly reporting the facts.
You can’t use analogies between crime and war, particularly not legal constructs like felony murder. You might as well argue that America should balance its budget like your family does. One has nothing to do with the other.
There is no criminal here. So there is no “felony murder” here either.
Wait, are you saying that Israel deserved peace with Gazans because they pulled out of Gaza (for their own purposes) despite the fact that it represented a tiny fraction of the settlements on Palestinian land?