“If it can’t be expressed in figures, it is not science; it is opinion.” – Lazarus Long
There is not a single expression or quantifiable prediction in your “finished theory”. Your theory is about as finished as a stripped pine wardrobe missing one door and infested with mountain pine beetles.
Stranger
I’m pretty sure it’s finished, as in “you’re finished in this town, pal.”
I like the bubbly blue background (you have to click “Read More” to see it)
It’s affected, not effected. That doesn’t make me want to click on Read More.
I did, however. I wonder if the number of mistakes in basic English are equal to the number of mistakes in basic science. Apparently this must be true in order to create a fundamental balance in the universe.
It’s mildly interesting to note that crackpots like this rarely claim to have an idea that will explain one particular phenomenon or legitimately open problem in science; instead, they have a magic Theory of Everything that doesn’t make any specific predictions (but totally would if someone could do the math for them; they’re more big-picture people) but nevertheless explains everything ever.
So, what specific, concrete, verifiable prediction does this sneer-quoted ‘theory’ make? In grown-up science, we’ve used things like the Michelson-Morley experiment, the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, the Stern-Gerlach experinment, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, etc. to rigorously test new ideas. Science is not just making shit up.
Anyway, in case anyone was thinking about wasting time at the linked website, here’s a representative excerpt.
[QUOTE=A website about physics!!1]
The particles are not yet charged and would be defined as neutrons. So how does the uncharged neutron get charged?
Photons of light traveling through space as a wave, enter the “displaced space” of a particle. The photon light wave decompresses relative to the displaced space. The wave cannot compress fast enough to exit into the regular space. The uncharged particle now becomes charged, creating a proton.
[/QUOTE]
Wait, so this displacement that causes the effect we describe as ‘gravity’, has a finite boundary wall? Gravity just stops at a certain range?
You website says “I believe…” so often I thought you were proselytizing for your own religion.
Truth in advertising. He *does *believe these things.
Sucks to be him, since zero of this nonsense is connected to reality. But he *believes *with the fervor of a thousand religious fundamentalists.
Yes, he prefers “I believe” egotism to ivy league egotism.
Seconded, if the author would channel his creativity into active webpage enhancements then society could be greatly improved. Just as it was wrong to laugh at the visionary who added colorful marshmallows to unpalatable puffed rice cereal, it is also wrong to laugh at this.
I prefer my “facts” come from them edjimicated folks, I guess.
every particle be it atomic or planetary displaces its own space relative to whatever displaced space field it is in. our planets mass displaces its own space as it occupies its position in the space being displaced by the mass of our sun.
this theory predicts magnetic fields around black holes.
You’re from Guam
Which does not answer the question you were responding to.
You’ve said something that’s sorta nearby the question. But which does not answer it. Please explain your actual answer to the conceptually very simple question that was asked.
Yes, but does it predict the Spanish Inquisition?
That would be totally unexpected. Fluffy pillow?
Every once in a while, this board manages a thread that cannot be believed if it isn’t seen. I see we have managed once again to accomplish this, though sadly, at less than 150 posts, it clearly lost steam much too quickly. I blame the original poster for this, since he steadfastly refuses to engage in verbal fisticuffs over his theory. :mad:
If only we’d all read his entire website. *Then *we’d get it. 
Unfortunately, it’s easy to find articles about magnetic fields around black holes going back to 2000 (probably earlier, I didn’t read through more than the first page of the google results) that don’t use your system. How would your predicted fields be different from their predicted fields?