Okay, I shouldn’t have said “definition” there with respect to the FDA. Apparently the treatment of “natural” labels is, rather, a “policy.” But the upshot is what I said: “natural” effectively means the absence of those things that are defined as something else.
Make your own popsicles next time, maybe? Mix some pure fruit juice into water, add sugar to taste, freeze in special ice tray (like this).
I’m not saying you’re not justified in being upset. But if you know you can’t feed your kid processed foods, avoiding buying them altogether is a plan that’s less likely to end in disappointment.
Oh gosh, we do generally make most of what she eats. But there are times (like this family picnic taking place three hours from home) when it’s much easier to grab something on the go. I am very aware that it is ultimately my responsibility to make sure I’m ok with what she eats. But doesn’t a company have a certain responsibility to provide accurate information regarding what is in their product? In a dream world, sure, I’d love to buy only fresh food and make everything we eat from scratch. But in (my) real world with two little kids, road trips, birthday parties, class parties, day camp, picnics, etc, sometimes buying packaged food would be nice. I always did trust the labelling (short of being suspicious of euphemistic phrasing as discussed above) and felt I had a nice balance of mostly homemade, “pure” stuff and the occasional exciting treat. I guess that’s part of my annoyance here, that this has made me have to re-evaluate my risk analysis in allowing myself these occasional conveniences, and it wasn’t a bubble I wanted to have burst.
I don’t know how it works in Canada, but in the US, unless the individual items in the box are specifically labeled for individual resale (as when you buy a wholesale sized carton) , whatever is written on the interior packaging is an irrelevancy.