Amanda Seyfried and the Prosthetic Butthole

There HAVE been cases of prosthetic breasts in movies, but usually to give the actress more heft. For the 1975 movie The Stepford Wives, makeup wizard Dick Smith made much larger breast prosthetics for Katherine Ross to wear in her near-the-climax scene, where she’s actually playing one of the automatons. She also wore black scleral contact lenses for the scene, but director Bryan Forbes messed up the lighting and presentation for those. The breasts,on the other hand, photographed beautifully under her sheer nightgown.

There’s a picture of Ross without the gown showing off the breasts in an issue of Coinefantastique at the time. Ross said she wore them home to show off to her husband.

Love it.

No. As usual, the truth is disappointing.

“I was pregnant and naked, but I wasn’t naked at all, and at the end of the movie, I’m standing in front of a burning building with just a merkin. I felt so free,” Seyfried explained of her nude scene in the movie’s final moments. “You cannot see my butthole in [the scene], but I swear there is a prosthetic butthole there.”

Mills inquired to why the film’s production utilized the prosthetic if audiences never see it, to which Seyfried replied, “Just in case,” jokingly adding, “Gotta get people to the theater.”

Talk about a rimshot.

mmm

It just strikes me as an opportunity missed.

Amanda Seyfried Plugs Prosthetic Butthole.

Some decades ago when I was in New Orleans and the strip-teasers were limited to G-strings and pasties, one stripper’s pasties were colored a reddish brown. I, uh, had to study a while to determine that they were, indeed, pasties.

I got that reference.

As for prehensile penises, was that a reference to this?

Whereas prehensile testicles would be a reference to this:

When I saw the thread title, I thought it was about a Roald Dahl story.

Amanda Seyfried and the Great Ass Emulator

I nominate this for a place in the Great Pun Title awards.

Indeed; this is brilliant.

I thought it was announcing the winner of the recent “Worst Movie Titles” thread.

*)

*) desperately trying to work in asterisk in there

YouTube just threw this at me:

“Scientists published a peer-reviewed paper on a dinosaur’s butthole. Here’s what they actually found.”

Now we’ll have to make a prosthesis of it for the next dinosaur movie.

For what it’s worth, the movie Evolution (2001) gave us a giant alien anus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chVmorXFmU0

Interesting choice of venue, there. Don’t they usually publish them in journals, instead? I’d expect those would get more readership than buttholes.

…this is all just standard nudity-rider stuff. The point is that what is exposed on camera needs to be negotiated in advance with the agent/talent, as well as making sure they are in compliance with standards and practice. It’s long been accepted that you can get away with stuff as long as it’s a prosthetic.

It sounds like there was potential for inadvertant exposure. So the production made sure the actress had coverage. And Seyfried thought that was funny, because it is funny, so she mentioned it in an interview, and it got turned into a clickbait article.

Allison Williams donned an entire prosthetic ass for an analingus scene in the HBO show Girls. Not sure whether it featured a prosthetic bunghole, though.

Anybody else imagining that they just tied a ballon to her backside?