I wonder if there are other examples in American military history were a general has been fired for a tactical blunder. Note that this is not about officers who are fired for reasons of personal conduct, making controversial remarks, stealing government money etc.
Many generals who served for the Union in the American Civil War were incompetent and were fired by Lincoln until he settled upon Grant. General McClellan comes to mind.
The book The Generals American Military Command from World War II to Today by Tom Ricks deals with this a lot. Part of his point is that back in WW2 and before Generals were frequently fired for under performing. He feels that modern generals get a pass from military leadership and only get fired by civilian leadership when its a political issue.
General McClellan was fired, if I recall correctly, because he was essentially unwilling to fight. But this could be viewed as a disagreement with the commander-in-chief on strategical matters in general. I was thinking more of blunders on the mere tactical level which occurred while they were responsible for the whole operation.
Dan Sickles in the Civil War nearly lost the battle of Gettysburg. He had too much clout to be fired (and lost a leg in the battle), but was sent away from the front lines.
I seem to remember a couple of generals of the Civil War who were sent off to command troops in Montana after mistakes.
On the Confederate side, Joseph Johnston was relieved of command because of the way he handled Sherman’s advance on Atlanta (though most historians agree that was unfair – Johnston did the best anyone could have done). But the South was so short on commanders then that he was put back into command.
True, but Truman’s fury was at DM not following orders and making what he regarded as the correct moves; isn’t that a form of tactical error? I’d have to go skim to see what the actual acts of insubordination were, but I recall some of them being severe misjudgments of enemy strength and intent.
Fitz John Porter was courtmartialled and dismissed from the army for his actions at Second Bill Run (although he was not the overall commander).
Besides McClellan, other Union commanders were dismissed, “allowed to resign,” or had overall command taken from them and given to someone else in the aftermath of major defeats, including McDowell, Pope, Burnside, and Hooker.
Truman’s main motivation and justification for firing MacArthur was the public statements he made. There may have been differences on tactical decisions too, but these were not the main and immediate reasons Truman took the extreme and controversial step of relieving him. MacArthur was not specifically accused of not following orders.
George Marshall, who was in Truman’s cabinet as Sec of State and was the top general in WWII told Truman that MacArthur should have been fired earlier.
Ambrose Burnside comes to mind instantly upon reading the OP
This list of worst Civil War generals includes five who are cited as having been relieved of command/“recalled”. And that’s an underestimate seeing that one of those generals (Braxton Bragg, CSA) had his command taken away after the disaster at Chattanooga, and became military advisor to Confederate Pres. Jefferson Davis.*
*which sounds like another disaster, but by that time even Bragg couldn’t have sent the South’s military fortunes much deeper into the toilet by giving bad advice.
Arthur St. Clair might be the first – he had the honor to be fired (aka “asked for his resignation”) by George Washington himself. President Washington was famously, thunderously pissed off:
[QUOTE=John Ferling]
According to his stepgrandson, who was residing at the President’s House in Philadelphia, Wasington’s hair-trigger temper snapped when he received word of the disaster. '“My last solemn warning to St. Clair,” he supposedly roared, had been to “beware of a surprise! You know how the Indians fight us.” Instead, Washington raged, his voice straining with anger, St. Clair had “suffer[ed] that army to be cut to pieces, hacked, butchered, tomahawked.” Washington knew there would be questions and condemnations, and he was correct.
[/QUOTE]
No surprise the Pres was pissed –
[QUOTE=Wikipedia]
The casualty rate was the highest percentage ever suffered by a United States Army unit and included St. Clair’s second in command. Of the 52 officers engaged, 39 were killed and 7 wounded; around 88% of all officers became casualties. After two hours St. Clair ordered a retreat, which quickly turned into a rout. “It was, in fact, a flight,” St. Clair described a few days later in a letter to the Secretary of War. The American casualty rate, among the soldiers, was 97.4 percent, including 632 of 920 killed (69%) and 264 wounded. Nearly all of the 200 camp followers were slaughtered, for a total of 832 Americans killed. Approximately one-quarter of the entire U.S. Army had been wiped out. Only 24 of the 920 officers and men engaged came out of it unscathed. Indian casualties were about 61, with at least 21 killed.
[/QUOTE]