Yeah, H2 (and History Int’l before that) lost much of the credibility it had left by hyping the 2012 Mayan ‘Apocalypse’ and endless ‘Doomsday’-esque shows…
I’ve always known there was a practical, logical reason for the Mayan calendar ‘ending’ in 12/2012. Hammering out a calendar using a chisel and tablet is NOT and easy task to start with. But the Mayans (for whatever reason) felt the need to create 24,000 years of historical calendars as well…they didn’t understand that you throw them out at the end of the year and don’t need the old ones!?
So after all that ‘typing/chiseling’ they came the end of a ‘cycle’, they were tired as hell and had a calendar good for centuries into the future. They probably thought a later generation could pick up the task and it just fell thru the cracks…but just because a calendar ends on a certain date, the assumption that the world and/or mankind would cease to exist at that time is moronic!
I read an article a few months ago stating that the rates of suicides leading up the December 2012 spiked inexplicably. That is fucking insane…although the ones who believed the world would end and offed themselves early were just thinning the herd, so to speak…and I also read that up to 10% of all Americans believed something life-altering or cataclysmic would occur on that date…also fucking idiots…
If we are the descendants of aliens, they really need to come back and fix some shit with humanity and our planet, since they obviously have the capability to do so.
I recently saw a program on H2 discussing whether Jesus might have been an alien? Now I’m just spit-balling here, but I really don’t think he would have endured that gruesome crucifixion if he had the ability to travel thru space and/or time…although that resurrection and ascension trick was pretty impressive! I’m more inclined to believe that it was either myth, a heavily embellished account of actual events, or even Divine/Supernatural…
But the program that followed it was actually very interesting. It was about the who decided what books would be included in the Bible and which ones were rejected. The process was completely random and devoid of the slightest logic, except for the decisioins made to further personal agendas of those making the decisions.
I’ve personally read several of the Gnostic Gospels and some of them are actually written much better than the ones included in the Canon! The Gospel of Mary, if they even knew it existed, would have been rejected because it was authored by a woman.
It amazes me that millions of people (including many of my friends and family members) believe that it is the literal Word of God and nothing could possibly be missing, nor could anything be included that shouldn’t be. Despite the fact that other writings, such as the Gnostic Gospels, were written BEFORE some of the included writings, based on scientific tests used to age actual writings. If a book was written in 200-250, I would question it’s authenticity or at least it’s accuracy since it the source material and subject of the writing was 200+ years in the past!
Again, faith is a gift I have yet to receive and probably never will, which is why I am so cynical and skeptical about it all. Growing up Pentecostal, now a 're-covering Pentecostal…and an ex-ex-gay" probably fuels my cynicism and inability to believe anything without undeniable proof…