I know what’s intended by the terminology, but it’s nevertheless amusing in a juvenile sort of way to read a story with repeated phrasing like “the primates believe” and “the primates issued a statement.”
Hah! That reminds me of one thing that bugs me in some Science Fiction. No matter what critters the space farers encounter on another planet, it’s always the humanoid or chipmanzee or other simians called primates. That’s even if the actual top level intelligent species on the planet is not humanoid/simians. That’s a glaring error in terminology, IMHO!
I’m reminded of a funny incident where the office of one such religious official got a letter from a research center for primate studies asking if they’d be willing to share data. They joked that while the Primate was known to enjoy the occasional banana, they’d never seen him walk on his knuckles.
Fun fact if you see a church called Anglican (rather than Episcopalian) in the US then it’s a schismatic off shoot of Anglican that has broken with the mainstream church over one the previous controversies like this. And, unlike the Episcopalian church, it’s probably super conservative (one of the few MAGAs in my social circle went to one of them, before deciding to be Catholic instead)
Yep, it’s the usual suspects resisting any sort of movement out of the eighteenth century, never mind into the 21st.
Pretty much hit it on the head. I wouldn’t put much into it; there are these sorts of schisms somewhat regularly; apparently there was one back in 1979 about the ordination of women and the adoption of a new Book of Common Prayer.
Personally I feel like we’re better off without those homophobic hillbillies and Africans who are splitting about this.
In M. R. Carey’s “Pandominion” series (1. “Infinity Gate”, 2. “Echo of Worlds”), there are a near-infinite number of alternate parallel Earths, and on each one of these planets, evolution has taken its own specific pathways. Some of these planets have no life, some of them are dominated by simian evolved species, some of them dominated by saurian evolved species, some of them by lagomorph evolved species, and so on.
There is a cause and effect loop here - sure, it’s homophobia from Christians because they are from Africa, where homophobia is prevalent stance, but part of the reason Africa is like that is because first world Christianity made it that way.
The GAFCON stance is more originalist. I don’t think that makes it right, but its the other part of Anglicanism that has changed.
This surprises me only because the Anglican church has been splitting since at least the 1970s - and pretty much always over the same reasons. GAFCON itself dates back almost 20 years. In the U.S. and Canada a whole bunch of churches split off from the Episcopalian Church in 2008 and formed the Anglican Church in North America. The only difference this year is that GAFCON no longer pays even lip service to the leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury
Not to mention the freakout over the new (1970s) prayer book for the Episcopal Church in the United States. I was Episcopalian at the time and was shocked by some of the vehemence over that, especially since the old book was basically included in the new book.