manson you didn’t answer my question
Is it destroyed? What about it is destroyed? Tire tracks in some mud DESTROYS the mud?
Why do you guys even bother… he’s going to show up in every thread about manmade damage to some public natural feature to post something dismissive, and he is not going to ever yield the point.
I’m just waiting for vandals to tear up about 3 feet of public street right in front on manson’s driveway.
What point? That idiots cry over rocks and mud?
I wasn’t aware that the rocks and mud in these vandal threads affected somebody’s ability to get to work. Is that the case? Is there a major commuter route through the mud that is no longer passable because some tire tracks are there?
And besides, if some vandals DID tear up about 3 feet of public street right in front of my driveway, I wouldn’t be sad over the poor asphalt.
Yes, it’s possible that they didn’t realized the kind of damage they were doing but they drove right past the signs. And the damage from the tires would have been immediately visible in the rear view mirrors. They may not have know how long the damage would last, but they knew they were doing damage.
Yes, *we’re *stupid because *you *don’t understand something.
I fully understand. I just think it’s stupid.
It was damaged just as if some vandals damaged your front yard or your house. Because it doesn’t impact me, you being upset if someone destroys all your property is stupid.
You have now officially lost. According to you it doesn’t matter if vandals destroy a rock formation or a dry lake bed but now it does matter if they destroy a public road if it affects YOU. Glad to find out that you admit you’re a hypocrite.
Your question wasn’t “What right do they have to damage it?” Let’s see what the question was:
Yep, your question used “destroy”. So now, either your question is stupid, or you are stupid for believing they destroyed something by leaving tire marks on mud. Which is it?
Are you this stupid or are you intentionally missing the point to troll.
Duckbill did not belong to the vandals so they had no right to ruin the formation.
The dry lake bed did not belong to the vandals so they had no right to ruin the surface.
Again your point leads one to the conclusion that if vandals broke into your home and destroyed all of your property that would be OK as long as they left the pieces. Do you agree with that statement?
Not quite. Plus I didn’t know we were playing a winner/loser game.
Also, yes, I care more about stuff that affects me then I do about stuff that doesn’t. So what?
And even with that, if the outrage was “Vandals knocked over some rocks and traffic on some road was backed up for miles and thousands of people couldn’t get to work, and babies were starving and kittens and puppies were abandoned” then yes, I would agree.
“Wahhhh, I can’t look at a rock or a pristine mud collection anymore!” - not so much.
No, because AGAIN, my stuff is private property. Rocks and mud - not private property.
Seems like a simple concept.
Mutual trolling. 
Nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.
Not simple enough for you, apparently.
Public property = not just any individual’s property to do with whatever they want.
OMG, thank GOD you came along to point this out! I would have NEVER known that vital piece of information!
When the “do with whatever they want” amounts to ROCKS being rearranged, or tire tracks in some MUD, who cares? Not me, THAT’S who!
And if you are SO outraged by rocks being knocked over, or some mud being disturbed, that you go online and post about how outraged you are because people can’t look at rocks, or a dry river bed, perhaps you should read more about actual REAL injustices in the world that happen to REAL people, and not rocks or mud.
That’s certainly evident from your posts.
You expend quite a lot of effort telling us you don’t care about something.
I’d respond to this but I’m too busy being annoyed by bigger assholes than you.