I agree with the OP completely, and think this was long overdue for being pointed out.
I once started a thread asking serious questions about child molestation for god’s sake and most of the responses I got were related to Catholic Priests, Pete Townshend, and Michael Jackson.
I love jokes and joke threads but I get tired of seeing lame post-pad jokes in serious (or just non-joking) threads.
When a question is asked (Clampers, for example) whose actual answer is a joke, who cares if your imaginary no-jokes-before-the-answer rule is violated? Shoot, you’d probably object to the ridicule that happens when some fool asks a serious question about the Iluminati.
Well, several dudes have made good points. Yes, some questions beg for ridicule. Most don’t, and this wasn’t one of them. Some questions need a Bump- this wasn’t one of them. Yes, a question about the Clampers could very well get a tongue-in-cheek answer; after all they are that kind of (dis) Org. In fact my answer was not entirely serious (but still a real answer). But the answer should have some bearing on the question- those did not. Nor am I pitting anyone in particular- after all, there is no such rule.
But I do think it is impolite- usually. Again- a stupid question, or a thread that needs bumping can be exceptions. I don’t want a “hard and fast rule” or “zeor-tolerance” either. I wouldn’t mind a general guideline, however.
However- far too many serious question threads are derailed and hijacked by silly, off topic answers. We are here to fight Ignorance, not help it along by shoving a pie in the face of Knowledge.
Me? I sort of enjoy doing the reverse: responding to a joke with a factual, cited answer. (And I suppose that’s a little like stopping to say a prayer while your having sex…)
I believe I may be the only person to have ever used the word “radionuclides” in a posting to MPSIMS…