Topography
/nitpick
That looks like a quickie video, possibly made by an AI. Given that there is no news reports about this at all, it doesn’t make any sense.
Add in finding a lifeboat on the bottom of the Atlantic, complete with remains that could be examined, etc., my boloney meter is off the scale. Why would the bodies stay with the lifeboat as it sinks to the bottom, etc.?
The Mary Celeste is officially classified as a ‘Ghost Ship’. So the obvious answer is that the crew was afraid of ghosts and all jumped ship.
This is as credible as some of the other theories.
There was no “Intelligence” of any kind involved in the creation of that piss-poor video. Jesus Christ, that was a Hot Mess.
The video actually had movie scenes in it
Hmm 
I think it’s more credible. Ghosts could explain a lot of mysteries. Flameless alcohol explosions that don’t cause significant damage yet induce people to jump into the ocean and die there instead of climbing back on the ship when there’s no sign of smoke would not explain many mysteries. If any, certainly not this one.
Are there credible sites that detail discovery of the lifeboat and DNA evidence that supposedly connects remains to descendants of passengers/crew?
Nope. Tried various searches.
Which brings up the question: can AI fabricate false stories like this? I don’t think this account (the lifeboat) is true but it does seem very specific.
ETA: and why post shit like this is it isn’t true?
Moderating:
Please attack the post, not the poster. This response is completely inappropriate in IMHO.
That comment was aimed at the YouTube link. Not any poster in this thread. In otherwards, why would someone post a YouTube video that contained things (shit) that wasn’t true.
To get people to watch it, of course. (I feel like I’m being whooshed)
No, I’m not whooshing. I understand that sensational headlines get views but ultimately if you publish stuff that is easily demonstratable as false, wouldn’t it hurt your credibility in the long run?
In content farming, they’re not really thinking about building credibility, just trying to hook people into clicking on sensationalist thumbnails and titles - there is no long term plan other than to pump out articles that people will click on.
Could it be that the worst part of Oak Island is bad narration? …sorry.
Absolutely. At present, that is one of the main complaints about AI: that it silently fabricates very specific complete garbage: legal references, obituaries, biographies etc, all embedded in coherent context and language.