This is messing with my normal contrariness. I have an affection for the underdog, and so I used to support Disney. Disney is the original 8 million pound gorilla, but it caught a lot of flak from critics because it toned down and transformed stories, “Disnifying” hem, etc. In defense of Disney I’d say that their version of Alice in Wonderland is entertaining and actually manages to work in a surprising number of the poems and references (more than you probably think – watch it again). Other versions are either a lot less faithful, or faithful and boring. Or, to give another example, I liked Hercules. Sure, they changed things around, and Zeus doesn’t get to be the REAL father of Hercules, but this is a 20th century kid’s film. They were able to keep quite a bit of the real story in place. And so on.
Yeah, I know they distorted The Little Mermaid totally out of shape. Hunchback f Notre Dame isn’t a great choice for a Disney flick, and they gave it a happy ending – but show me ONE SINGLE VERSION of THOND on film that is faithful to Victor Hugo. They ALL change the ending - even the Lon Chaney version. When I saw the animation of Quasimodo rescuing Esmeralda from the stake I almost cried – it was gorgeous.
The problem is that Disney isn’t the underdog anymore – not even critically, a lot of the time. So now I should go to hating Disney. But I don’t. I still prefer both incarnations of Fantasia to Bruno Bozzetto’s Allegro Non Troppo (damn – almost every story in that has a sad ending. Just because you’re not being Disney doesn’t mean you have to be depressing!) Disnet films are satisfyingly constructed and have gorgeous animatio and special effects.
And, of course, now that we have our almost-four-year-old MilliCal, we’re stuck. She watches the films constantly, and she has Lion King memorized from the tapes.