That’s somewhat interesting, but I don’t know how much credence I would put into it. Like Martian Bigfoot says, the strategy is pretty easy. Each person would start by asking the 10 to pair, then ask for the 9, and so on until they aren’t rejected. They were told to try to pair up with the highest number they could find.
What would be more interesting to me was if the subjects had been rated from most to least attractive, but they couldn’t see the ratings, just the scientists on the side knew the ratings. Then all the people were told to just pair up with the person they would most like to pair up with. This seems to be more of a real world situation to me. Then if those people still matched up a 10 with a 10, a 9 with a 9, and so on, then that would be an interesting conclusion to me. I’m guessing there would still be some correlation, but it wouldn’t be exact. Instead of a 10 with a 10, a 9 with a 9, it would probably be more like a 10 with an 9, a 9 with a 7, and so on.
Thanks for satisfying my curiosity. He seems to have a good outlook on things. There’s nothing wrong with realizing that one person in a relationship is more conventionally attractive than the other, but neither person should think of themselves as better or above the other person.