So each and every liberal is operating with no basis in fact. Strange logic you have there. You on the other hand are just bathed in the glow of logic and light up like a beacon of fairness. Why can’t the liberals just think like you?
That doesn’t sound like the common definition of common sense to me.
Common sense is that category of logic that covers things like ‘don’t cuddle the tigers’. It’s not something that people memorise, it’s stuff that anyone should be able to work out, on the fly.
Alternately known as wisdom, which is most certainly not the “lowest form of sense”.
Unrelated to the above, this is being too smart for your own good.
Wisdom is not common sense anymore than wisdom is not intelligence.
Common sense is the rationale used when you cannot come up with a rational reason to believe in something.
Your example of “don’t cuddle the tigers” must also be lumped into “don’t eat tomatoes” or “don’t sleep in a room with a fan on”. All devoid of analysis just handed down as facts to know.
All the usual given examples of common sense are usually nothing more than instinct.
I do find it interesting along which political lines this debate seems to be falling.
You appear to be operating on a definition of common sense that I haven’t seen before, equating it to superstition and old wives’ tales. “Throw salt over your shoulder to get rid of bad luck” seems to be the sort of thing you’re talking about, while “Don’t throw salt over your shoulder, because your brother is behind you and you’ll hit him in the face” is common sense.
The only definition M-W gives for common sense is “sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts.” Sure sounds like wisdom to me.
You’d think ‘Don’t hug the pandas’ would be common sense. Sadly, it isn’t.
Not in my experience of using and hearing other people use the term. Common sense relates to outcomes that should be obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.
Nope. Don’t cuddle the tigers because they will fucking eat you. It’s analysis of the (should be) obvious outcome.
I believe you’re referring to ‘common knowledge’, which is a different thing from common sense, and is frequently incorrect.
Christopher Hitchens wrote of Socrates: “All he really ‘knew’, he said, was the extent of his own ignorance. (This to me is still the definition of an educated person.)” I think that pretty well defines your average Doper, even if we sometimes fail to recall this fact in the heat of battle.
But there are a few “total dipsticks” on this board, as we’ve known since, I think, 1973!
It might be time for an Ambrose Bierce definition:
LOL! I don’t know you yet, but I know I’m going to like you!
I’d rather spend time with a kind person than a so-called ‘smart’ person anyday. - Jesse.