What is this “respectable fellow member of your profession” and how does it have anything to do with having an erection around a hot girl? 
Was that something her camp required, or was it the producers’/studio decision?
Also, cite.
(I’m not calling you a liar, just asking for more info.)
I’d be interested too. I’d guess that Grey wanted to establish the role as an actress, making her a cross-over star, and not seem like a type of sexual stuntgirl.
We have the DVD, and in the Special Features, Grey says Soderbergh approached her about making the movie, much to her surprise. He’d read a mainstream article about her somewhere and thought she’d be perfect for the story. I don’t think she’d had any notions of becoming a legitimate actress before that.
I think it might have occured to her since cross-over star is a category in the AVN awards. But that doesn’t address why this was specified in her contract, or if it was.
Opening scene of “Anti-Christ”… I’m pretty sure that’s Willem Dafoe’s penis going right into Charlotte Gainsborg’s vagina.
No way that those aren’t body doubles.
Found it.. From the cite:
My Google-Fu is STRONG!
So, she was willing and assumed she would, and her contract said she couldn’t.
I’m guessing that’s a studio rule, to protect them from liability and also to set a certain level of behavioral standards, so as not to offend the type of people who might be offended if they found out that a major studio was letting actors have actual sex on set.
Man that Soderbergh is wierd (in the eyes of this wierd guy). I think this begins to explain why some of his movies suck so much. Maybe he thought it would affect the characters motivation or something. Or maybe somebody’s wife insisted that clause be in there.
I think I’ll pass on Antichrist.
David Arquette talked about this topic on Howard Stern, who is endlessly fascinated by it. David said that most of the time, yeah, it’s unsexy, lots of teamsters in the room, blah blah blah. But occasionally you do get lost in the moment, though usually the actress won’t know because there’s a pillow between you. And in those cases you can always just “fuck the shit out of the pillow.” hehheh.
I once saw a Jenna Jameson interview on E! where she talked about how easy it was for women in porn because you could always slap on some lube. A little while later in the interview she was talking about viagra, and how she hated it because it seemed like cheating to her. She never appeared to make the connection.
Jenna is not renowned for the depth of her thought processes. And from what I’ve seen of her porn work, she’s always faking it.
And in the 1800s, it could only be rendered with a Viva la Difference Engine.
Very few people know that the Lovelace family connection with porn began with Linda’s great-great-great-grandmother Ada Lovelace, who programmed early 19th Century pornographic animations on a Babbage engine. Our forefathers knew that a Babbage/Lovelace production was going to be gooood…
n/m
After he murdered his wife’s lover, in the 1880s Muybridge made a lot of zoopraxiscope moving pictures of naked women, naked men, and naked animals (e.g. naked women dancing together, naked men wrestling together, and naked animals just being themselves). In 1893 he charged admission to audiences, making the worlds first cinema a nudie cinema. Yay Eadward!
My fav being the naked woman climing up a ladder to dump a bucket of water down on another naked women in a washtub. Those Victorians sure knew how to live.
I have created a monster!