Are the actions of BLM wise or foolish?

Yo, no one is going to be hurt. I just want to know the roots of the movement.

The “Revcom” stuff is a bullshit conspiracy theory. “Seen as communists” by their critics, perhaps, but that doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with reality.

It’d be nice if you had cites for claims like they “want to hurt the free market”.

Bring some cites, bruh.

[QUOTE=GloryDays]
Yo, no one is going to be hurt.
[/QUOTE]

I don’t think that’s what “and that is a fact” means.

This particular BLM action seems rather foolish.

See post 328.

But Crack is exponentially more addictive than cocaine, is it any surprise that criminal law treats these two drugs as being almost entirely unrelated.

I think this is a good point.

It could have been stated a little better though, just saying.

Is this a whoosh?

Wiki says

It goes on to add that

I did think it was a hoax at first, but as far as I can tell the article is genuine.

I can acknowledge that crack might not be as addictive as it was once thought to be, and I can perhaps accept that crack & cocaine are physically/ chemically addictive as each other. But if your first experience of coke had as much buzz as two expressos and only marginally more enjoyable, and your first experience of crack was like heaven on earth- which substance is more likely to turn you into a complete fiend?

If the BLM (or any other “movement”) has done actions /made points /picked hills to die on that when something else extremely stupid comes along and you can’t be sure whether they actually did it or it is a PARODY of their past behavior…well, that right there tells you they are a borderline joke already.

What I mean is, are YOU whooshing us? I’ve read that article four times now, and I’ve not seen anything that demonstrates that BLM has any hand with what’s happening on that campus. If I’m wrong, please correct me.

Looking at the article again I can see that you’re right. I don’t know where I got the idea that this was a BLM protest from. My apologies.

There was one tweet quoted that contained “#blacklivesmatter” that may have planted the seed:

“.@KUTriDelta cares more about philanthropy than #blacklivesmatter #RockChalkInvisibleHawk @KUnews @KansanNews @InvisibleHawks

Aight, bruh, I got some facts about the Revcom.

http://revcom.us/a/373/joe-veale-black-lives-matter-latino-lives-matter-all-lives-matter-en.html

Revcom exists and has opinions. That doesn’t confirm any of your assertions, which appear like right-wing conspiracy theories.

First of all stop that-it isn’t funny. And before you think I’m saying it isn’t funny because I’m #triggered or whatever, that isn’t the case. I know a Pinochet loving minarchist authoritarian on Facebook and he’s hilarious. The problem is you aren’t-you basically sound like some Victorian gentlemen trying to get in touch with the youth of day by exchanging his top hat for a Skateboarder helmet while keeping rest of his suit on and going to the local park and going “Yo dudes, this is so cool radical!”.

GloryHole logic (sic):
A: People support Black Lives Matter
B: Some random retarded leftist sect supports Black Lives Matter
C: Therefore all BLM supporters subscribe to said retarded leftist sect

Let us apply this logic closer at hand:
A: GloryHole supports high military spending
B: The Nazis supported high military spending
C: Therefore GloryHole is a Nazi

Looking forward to seeing you with your Einsatzgruppen comrades clearing out the Gypsies from the village tomorrow. :slight_smile:

Yo, first of all calm down. I’m not a Nazi. Come on, brother, I’m not about that life. I am an American who is an independent. I want a strong military, because a weak one is not a good one. I want to have a good discussion.

From what I can tell from your posts, the policies you advocate would weaken our military and America as a whole, and increase the dangers of terrorism, rather than strengthen us and weaken our enemies.