Are the Lindsay Lohan Nekkid Beaver Pics Photoshopped?

Cisco, www. lohangroupie. com (without the spaces, of course) has the picture.

[QUOTE=DianaG]
Cisco, www. lohangroupie. com (without the spaces, of course) has the picture.
[/QUOTE]

Thanks. Not so hot.

Yeah, she’s been beat up, but I’d knock it out too if I had the opportunity. It’d be a fun little nugget on my sexual resume, I think.

[QUOTE=featherlou]
You know, there’s one sure-fire way of not having pictures of you taken with your lady bits all hanging out, swinging in the breeze…
(Yes, I’m talking about wearing underwear.)
[/QUOTE]

There’s one other sure-fire way: Be a dude.

[QUOTE=Snooooopy]
There’s one other sure-fire way: Be a dude.
[/QUOTE]

Well, I suppose that might work, too. Actually, that’s not sure-fire - what if you’re a hermaphrodite dude? Then you might have both sets out swinging in the breeze. But maybe if you’re a hermaphrodite, then you’re not a dude. I’m so confused. :confused:

[QUOTE=Snooooopy]
There’s one other sure-fire way: Be a dude.
[/QUOTE]

For 100% certainly, be a dude with two bottles of Stolinchnaya and half an ounce of high-test Bolivian marching powder. Then you’re her dreamboat.

I don’t know if the picture with or without the panties is the original. But I’m pretty sure the one I saw with a penis was fake.

For those of you keeping score at home, Lindsay decided to air it out for the cameras again. No doubts about what you’re seeing this time; you can make out all the details … like that pimple.

Here’s even more proof that Ms. Lohan wants the world to know she owns a razor… and not the phone kind, either (scroll about halfway down).

I’d like to commend her for going up the creek with two paddles.