No - you’re right. Budweiser is a lager. I was thinking of Miller and I wrote Budweiser instead (for reasons that I think should be obvious)…
I wouldn’t say that I would “drink stuff I don’t like” rather than abstaining from alcohol because I like all beer - some more than others - even cheap mass produced beer.
I don’t like mouthwash much. Not for drinking anyway. And I don’t like Triple Sec straight.
It takes love. They lack the love. Plus a publicly traded company can’t really make a great beer just for the hell of it. That would be illegal and somebody would get fired or else the CEO might go to jail.
Pilsner is a type of Lager so anyone can reasonably advertise themselves to be both. It’s funny - I pay so little attention to the megabrews that I wasn’t ever aware of all the beers in the MillCoors portfolio…
Whatever advertising literature you plan to dig up or whatever obsession you’re going to heap on the word “is”… Miller and Miller Lite have advertised themselves as Pilsners for decades.
The pilsner designation in American macrobrews is a fairly meaningless bit of marketing. About all it means is that you’re going to get some sort of pale lager and that it may have, at some point in its history, been inspired by an actual pilsner along the way, even though it has little in common with one, other than using lager yeast and pale malts. I don’t even think Miller uses the term beyond their slogan “great pilsner taste” anymore. I’m pretty sure they used to have “true pilsner” or “natural pilsner” or something similar on their labels years ago.
Some of the best beers in the world are brewed by publicly traded companies.
Get yourself a pint of Velkopopovický Kozel dark and then tell me that public companies can’t brew excellent beer. (Kozel is owned by SABMiller, just like Pilsner Urquell and Radegast)
Or for that matter, you’re going to tell me that Greene King, Wychwood, Brakspear or Ringwood don’t make good beer?
The big boys can make great beer if they want. Here in the US, as everywhere, they brew what sells. In the UK it’s beers like Ruddles County and Brakspear Bitter, while in the US it’s Miller Chill and Bud Light Lime.
Regular Busch is 4.3%; Budweiser is 5.0%. So there is some validity to what you’re saying, but I would not expect alcohol content to necessarily be the driving force for pricing.
And one third of a can (4 oz) of Budweiser has about as much alcohol as 4.65 oz of Coors (so you’d only need 0.65 ounces, or 4 teaspoons more of Coors to ingest the same amount of alcohol, not an entire third of a can as you’re suggesting. For that, Busch would have to be 2.5% abv.)
Me, too. But I actually *like *Busch, in a “My gods it’s hot out here!” kinda way. Can’t stand Budweiser. It’s the rice. Corn in beer as an adjunct, sure. But not rice.
A long neck Busch is fantastic after mowing the yard. Find a shady spot on the deck and enjoy. Goes down so good on a hot day. We put it in the ice chest for fishing trips.
I pay more for Michelob because it has a smoother, cleaner taste. Michelob is premium priced compared to Busch or Budweiser.