Being an self-admitted atheist in the US is a sign of, at least, a contrary character.
You might as well consider the crime statistics of generally atheist countries with the US.
The US scores pretty well on total crime rates, but the netherlands is almost equally good.
When looking at homicide with firearms, religious US is ranking 8 and atheistic netherlands doesn’t even list in the ranking after no 32.
NZ has its issues, but I wouldnt consider it one of the most lawless places in the world. I suspect this is more about countries which are best at collecting actual crime rates, or that issue is at least conflating the data a bit.
After all, it’s convention that religion preys specifically on the minds of the weak and vulnerable; children, the disenfranchised, the incarcerated…
So logic would dictate – ironically, given religion being the subject matter – that those in an introspective-cum-hopeless situation, as is oftentimes the case with incarceration (especially relating to serious crime), would turn to The Flying Spaghetti Monster to ‘bail them out’ with some fanciful promise of a grape-feeding love-in in the sky, if only they ‘repent’.
Even being in prison doesn’t mean one is necessarily there for a violent or otherwise particularly heinous crime. If the results are looking at the total prison population, not the ones convicted of a specific offense of class of offenses, there may be a problem.
Besides, in a vastly religious country, it’s possible a known atheist might be discriminated against, including by police. I remember some Youtube clip from a documentary titled “the price of atheism” or something along those lines getting me pretty outraged.
I wouldn’t think it that odd if a large % of the incarcerated were atheist.
Not if you consider that most of those in prison have been “outside the flock’s influence” for some time already.
Most would have had quite a few life experiences that would make them doubt the “God Loves You” story.
What one should be careful of, of course, is the heavily implied switch; A high % of criminals doesn’t believe in God = Atheists have a high % of criminals in their ranks.
What makes you think the “God Loves You story” is incompatible with being a criminal? On the contrary, it serves as a great excuse; God loves you, but those guys over there are fair game.
I’m not saying it’s incompatible.
Obviously it is compatible . For about 2000 years practically all criminals would have been religious, as not believing in God was simply not an option.
Nowadays it is a box you can tick and I think that far more criminals will tick that box where in days past they would, as you say enter into a sort of private relationship with God. or however else they would ignore their ‘sins’, or live with them.
That is an interesting essay. I would still like to know the effect that regular church attendance has on criminal behavior, especially among high crime populations. Lower income, inner city neighborhoods seem to have lots of churches, but most of those attend seem to be female.
Lower income minority males from the age of fifteen to thirty are most likely to be guilty of crimes, especially violent crimes. Such a male who already has a felony conviction may have started going to church in order to please a parole officer, or in a genuine effort to reform.
In order to evaluate the effect regular church attendance has on criminal behavior it would be necessary to compare the church attendance of those who have recently been arrested with comparable populations who have not been arrested. My guess is that regular church attendance does reduce criminal behavior significantly, but I would like to know by what percentage it does so.
What do you mean?
I bet a lot of criminals will have been terrified once their deaths approached, because they did indeed believe their afterlife punishment would be terrible.
Exactly, and that leads me to wonder if the question the original poster is asking is really “is there a higher proportion of atheists in the prison community than the general population?”