Are we just ignoring Der Trihs (This isn't a Pitting, but I don't know where else to put it.)

I went a couple of rounds with Der before I realized that he is only capable of assertion and has absolutely no ability to argue. He doesn’t even know the difference between an assertion and an argument. For a short period I decided to just buck up to him and counter his assertion wall posts with a counter-assertion wall of my own. He didn’t seem to notice that I was intentionally pulling his own dumbass trick on his dumb ass, and he dutifully followed up with a second round of assertion. So, I’ve done my time with him and I’m done.

Also, hi, I’m back from a short hiatus. I started an MPSIMS thread if you want to show your love (lookin’ at you especially, Guin).

Holy mother of fuck. I actually summoned the Beast. Woe, woe.

I hereby dub thee, Rand Rover, He Wot Shall Not Be Named.

I hope you’re happy, Kobal. heh- I was going to come over here and link to it for ya.

But now you see what you’ve done…

This board is liberal. the news has a liberal slant. The moderators are prejudices against the poor misunderstood righties. Everything is slanted against them. i don’t know how they can continue to push on.
Like Bush said, being a righty is hard.

Dude, you are SO not getting a Christmas card from me this year…

Not to interrupt the Rand Rover lovefest, but I just saw this and really have to emphatically agree with magellan01 and Nzinga, Seated. People who use ‘we’ to pretend that they’re on the winning side of an argument are just annoying.

As to Der Trihs, he cracks me up.

We are NOT amused…

-XT

I don’t normally like to continue hijacks, but this is so obnoxiously stupid and it’s the pit that I felt like I couldn’t hold in my irritation.

Obviously “cognitive bias” (ie not being a true believer) limits the effectiveness of something that relies entirely on the placebo effect. That’s the whole deal. Magic only appears to work when everyone involved wants the magic to work and has no ability to be honest with themselves or think critically. What you said is no different from saying “when doctors give you sugar pills, and you know they’re sugar pills, that cognitive bias limits the effectiveness”… duh.

It must be like when those dowsers or psychics or telepaths can’t operate under controlled, observed conditions because the “negative skeptic energy is ruining the vibe man”

What nonsense can’t you defend with this line fo thinking? “You can’t evaluate psychic predictions by judging it for something it’s not, you have to judge it by its own criteria”? Astrology, Ouija boards, dowsing, healing crystals … sure we can take that silly “scientific” approach and discredit them all as being nonsense, but you have to evaluate them by their own criteria! Then they’re totally cool man!!!

Anyway, Der Trihs is someone who damages the side they argue on, even if he happens to be right. Which he does, sometimes. Most of what he’s said about religion is completely and obviously true - and yet both because he’s someone who’s so consistently crazy and often wrong (or at least too extreme) he makes it easy for you to dismiss his views, and so he actually damages the ideas he attaches himself to.

I cringe when I see him bashing religion, even though he’s totally right. Not that it’s hard to be totally right on the subject - it’s one of the most obvious things of all time if you have a little bit of honesty and critical thinking. It’s just that we’ve been culturally programmed to think that religious nonsense beliefs deserve more respect than other nonsense beliefs, and so few are willing to go as balls-out when calling religion silly as he is. But I know he’s not going to win over any recruits and he’s going to alienate anyone not inclined to already agree with him - and I also just feel generally uncomfortable being on the same side as him on any debate because how consistently wrong and/or crazy he is. So whatever he thinks he’s doing to fight for the cause, he’s probably doing just the opposite.

That said, I don’t think he really trolls or intentionally threadshits. I think he’s mentally ill to a degree. His world is so ridiculously black and white and unchanging and lacking in nuance that it’s sort of ironic that he correctly bashes psychology of religion, when some of the same shortcomings affect his worldview. So I have an easier time just sort of glossing over and dismissing his threadshitting, as opposed to someone like Shodan where he knows exactly what he’s doing and it’s deliberate rather than just an extention of being crazy. Which isn’t to say that I’m condoning him in any way - on most issues, like the OP, I more or less just skip his posts.

Cite for him ever doing anything like what I bolded, especially recently?

I, too, have noticed some nice posts of **kanicbird **in non-religion threads that made me go “huh? well, you never can tell…”.

I don’t understand this argument about Der Thris’s sensible and completely logical position about Religion. He’s a bit heavy on the rhetoric sometimes (I don’t care so much for the word “evil” that he likes to throw around) but I have never seen him trying to recruit anyone, although I may have missed it. There’s no badge or secret handshake. It’s simply intellectual honesty and critical thinking, like you said, but for its own sake. If you’re going to engage in debate, that’s the point right? Or better yet the point is that religion is glorified shamanism and people don’t or shouldn’t have to pretend otherwise or tip toe around that. That is to be admired, not repressed. I have never even noticed Der Thris being rude to anyone, only attacking their beliefs, that deserve nothing better than mockery on an intellectual level. Personally hardcore bible-thumpers seriously creep me out, besides their many other shortcomings, but that’s just me. And hey, I’m a pretty reasonable guy, so Der can’t be all that bad.

I’m admitting that he’s right. My point was more along the lines of… he’s so consistent and caustic and lacking in nuance that even when he gets one right, in a way he does a disservice for the side he’s arguing for. If he’s easy to dismiss and silly about 90% of his beliefs, then the other 10% he believes in sort of get (minorly) discredited by association even though he’s right. I’m not saying he’s wrong in any way, but when I find myself agreeing with Der Trihs I view it as time to reflect and double check to make sure I’m right :stuck_out_tongue:

That’s never a bad thing. I get what you’re saying, I meant to address your point, often repeated by others, that he’s hurting this nebulous cause towards which all atheists are supposed to be working in concert because he doesn’t use the kid gloves when debating religion. Maybe because I don’t see it as taking sides, unless the side of logic and reason counts.

Oh boy, the regularly scheduled Der Trihs pitting. Does anyone care what my opinion is?

I think Der Trihs gets way more shit than he deserves. On many issues, I quite agree with him; on some, I markedly disagree with him. Much like any other poster. I guess maybe he’s blunt and doesn’t particularly care to tactfully address those he has a difference of opinion with on certain issues; shrugs, I do things differently, but I’m not put off by his being that way. I don’t even find him particularly different from myriad other posters in this respect.

Frankly, if it weren’t for these threads, I wouldn’t find his posting style all that noteworthy. I’m still sort of surprised other people do.

(Yeah, alright, there wasn’t much point to this post, but I thought I might serve as some kind of counterbalance to the usual dynamic in these threads, where the worked-up minority become very vocal while the majority who don’t really care get glossed over in their silence.)

The whole point of that thread is for posters to post things which they consider facts but which others do not accept as such. Der Trihs was in no way out of line. You’re being ridiculous.

In fact, let me go further than this. In my experience, I agree with Der Trihs far more often than not. Obviously, he’s not right about everything (no one is except me), but quite frequently, I see people whining about him taking a stance they consider beyond the pale in some way or another and find myself thinking “Really? That? He’s right, you know” or at least “Really? That? Christ, grow some thicker skin”.

Someone once said in one of these threads that many on these boards like to use Der Trihs as a kind of designated whipping boy, as in “See? He may be nominally on my side, but I can disavow him too. Look how reasonable and non-partisan I am.” Bah.

What hate speech? Expressing disagreement, dislike or even hatred of a group is not hate speech, you know.

I’m another who agrees with him more often than disagrees with him.

When I first saw the OP, I thought, “Huh, that’s interesting. I never noticed anybody ignoring Der Trihs before. I wonder why they do that?” But then a few minutes later I noticed that he had posted a reply to one of my posts in Great Debates. He quoted one sentence of it, and his reply made it extremely obvious that he didn’t even bother to read (or utterly failed to comprehend) the rest of my post.

So yeah, count me as another person who will probably be ignoring Der Trihs posts…

I suggest you relax your sphincter.