I mean, does it really matter that Tiger Woods endorses Buick, even though he probably drives a Porsche? Or more mundane things-local has-been athletes shilling for a local furniture store. Why do advertisers still do this? Am I to concluded that because an NFL quarterback uses razor X, that i ought to? I’ve noticed-celebrity endorsements bring in a LOT of money-shouldn’t the ads contain a disclaimer…something like…" these claims have not been supported by factual evidence, endorsement is compensated?
"?
I’d say part of wanting Tiger Woods in your commercial is for the thrill of saying afterward that you met Tiger Woods; people who shoot commercials have heroes, too.
George Carlin: Do you have a product no-one will buy because it’s poorly built and doesn’t work properly? Likely to come apart at high speeds? Perhaps with toxic side effects? Well, give it to me and I’ll sell it to them. You see, they trust me, because I’m a famous person.
Where does the dishonesty come in?
And what about non-famous people in ads? Pick up a magazine and look at the people pictured in the ads: do you assume that those people, in real life, use those products?
Methinks not. Dost thou?
Okay, maybe I’m crazy. I’m willing to admit it’s a possibility. But I swear I remember reading an interview with a person who was in a series of famous ads who said that they had gotten a shitload of [whatever product] from the company because they had to be able to honestly say that they used it.
That is what happened with George Foreman and the amazing story of “his” grill mean machine:
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2003/06/09/343949/index.htm
I still wonder why this tale was not made into a TV movie of the week.
Man, I never thought a CNN Money article would give me the warm-and-fuzzies. Thanks for sharing that,
He seems like a genuinely nice guy who’s sincere about what he does. Makes me glad to own a Foreman grill.
All personal testimonials are inherently unreliable, because they can be bought or faked. Even if the testimonial is genuine, it represents just a sampling of opinion and the seller may be concealing a raft of complaints.
One time in a car dealership I was waiting for a salesman and saw a notebook on a table with comments from customers about service. All the comments on the opened pages were favorable. I paged back a bit and found some complaints, then wandered off to look at something else. I returned a few minutes later to check out one of the negative reviews again and found that someone had already turned the pages back to the flattering comments.
Hard to think of a more ludicrous ad than Tiger Woods promoting Buicks. I mean, you could tell seeing him behind the wheel that he was thinking “Get me out of this thing before my image totally goes down the tubes!”.
The best local fried chicken chain advertises that it is the “official fried chicken of the Chicago Bears training table.” Unlike many such claims I have no doubt this is true.
What I find funny are the low rent local ads featuring long-forgotten sports stars pushing windows, furniture, etc. Or the athlete who has trouble with two syllable words, earnestly praising some kind of razor, cologne, etc. Do you eat Wheaties because (presumably) the late Mickey mantle did?
I have no problem with a celebrity endorsing a product if he or she actually uses the product. If I were a celebrity, I’d say, “I worked long and hard for this fame. If they want to pay me for it, I’ll take their money.”
Buick is itching for a new market niche. The average age of their customer base is about 60, so they’re looking to be the right car for young, successful black people. Now, who’s the most successful YSBP who isn’t stained by crime, drugs, or misogyny? It’s Tiger, of course. So, they offered him a Buick or three (and a roomful of money,) to smile and say he drives a Buick (his golf bag says Buick, too.) What’s dishonest about that? He drives what he says he drives, and nobody thinks he’s doing those spots for free. He never says Buick is the best car in the world; he never even says all his cars are Buicks. He doesn’t say much at all. He just parks his million dollar smile in a new Lucerne.
If you could get big bucks for driving a Buick, would you do it? You damn betcha!
I remember an old “Saturday Night Live” skit where Mark Harmon (back when that meant something) started off a commercial selling beer or something, then broke character and said to the camera “Does it upset you that I’m selling this product? Well, don’t let it, I could be selling anything. I’m appealing to women without being threatening to men, and If I was pitching it, you’d buy nuclear war. Be happy it’s just beer.”
It was funny, because it was true. I remember Robert Young dressed as Marcus Welby actually doing the “I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV” bit. Why should someone with a high TV “Q” (whatever that means) be able to sell something they know nothing about? I don’t know, but they can. Just be happy they’re not selling something worse.
Why do you think a celebrity saying openly “I endorse this product” is more or less dishonest than a celebrity getting paid to appear in some kind of stunt to endorse the product (Magic Johnson jumping with Nikes for example) or some unknown actor being paid to play a doctor to endorse a toothbrush or similar? Almost all advertising is lying, manipulating, exaggerating/downplaying; not an objective comparision of facts so you can make an informed decision. That’s what consumer protection groups do.
I agree whole-heartedly.
On second thought, I’m not sure the “almost” is necessary…
Probably drives a Porsche?
I think we need to know what sort of car(s) Mr. Woods drives before we can discuss the level of (dis)honesty involved. For all we know, Tiger could be a real-life dyed-in-the-wool LeSabre fanatic.
Pretty much sums it up for me…
When a certain online bank decided to start doing business in Spain, they had the problem of being the first of its kind.
They hired a well-known second-generation newscaster for the ads, which he did for about 3 years.
A few months ago, he was being interviewed on TV. The interviewer asked him about those ads. Excerpts from his responses:
A recent financial scandal has hurt internet banking badly. Their current spokesman in the campaign that’s trying to sent the message “hey, we’re a bank, those guys weren’t!” without actually saying so: the newscaster. Still happily touting a bank where, yep, he does have an account and his mortgage.
That’s one case where I absolutely believe he’s being honest as well as getting paid. The two are not incompatible.
Because artists never want money? Such idealism!
Has any research ever been done to determine if celebrity endorsements increase the sales of a product? I would assume they do, or they wouldn’t pay the celebs big bucks, but I am just trying to picture the person who buys a product because his favorite athelete endorses it, and I just can’t see that there are that many people who would take their celebrity adoration as far as to have one tell them what products to use.