Martin,
Thanks for patiently handling everyone’s questions so far. I have several which concern the conflict of the archaeological record with the faith of believers:
- How can a religion founded by a man who, as an astute merchant, led raids on competing caravans and slayed and robbed their members, be called peaceful? Also, the Koran may advocate protecting Christians and Jews, but it does, indisputably recommend killing pagans who refuse to convert. How can that be reconciled with peace?
(Note, this should not turn into a “Well, the Jews sacked Canaan” sort of thing. In fact, this shows an irreconcilable difference between Islam and many forms of Christianity. It was settled by Saint Augustine in his Confessiones that God had one sort of morals for before Christ’s coming and one sort for after, so what the Jews did was fine but any mass slaying in the name of God after AD 1 is not.)
-
What do you think of the affair of the satanic verses, attested to by Muslim sources, that show that Islam either grew out of or made concessions to polytheism?
-
Along the same lines: What do you think of the opinion held by many archaeologists of the Arabian peninsula of the time that Muhammad merely choose one of the 200+ idols of Mecca to emphasise and that the religion was never wholly monotheist during Muhammad’s time.
-
How do Muslims rationalise veneration of the black stone in the Ka’aba, which was a pagan object of worship for centuries before Muhammad?
UnuMondo