Eradicating ignorance begins with eradicating religion. No great thinker in history has ever been religious. No great culture has ever concerned itself with religion. And no modern scientist of any significance is religious. That’s because science has demonstrated convincingly that there is no [nonsense reference deleted].
American Atheists represents all atheists, including the cowards who call themselves “agnostics” and “soft atheists”. You can ask me what atheists think because we speak for all of them, and I speak for all of us. And while I am an equal opportunity hand-stabber, make no mistake that I’m gunning for the [nonsense reference deleted]ians.
If you quote the Bible to me, I will puke on your shoes. I’m not here to talk about nonsense.
“Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none more derogatory to the [nonsense reference deleted], more unedifying to man, more repugnant to reason, and more contradictory in itself than this thing called [nonsense reference deleted]ianity.” — Thomas Paine
It’s only fair that since there is a Jack Chick guy speaking for the [nonsense reference deleted]ians, there should be a rational guy speaking for the atheists. Is it not?
Or is what you are doing here nothing more than the persecution that we suffer on a daily basis? Religious people are given Carte Blanche to spout their lies and fraud. But people like you are always trying to shut up those of us who believe in our brains.
That article is a vile piece of slander. Her remark about nuns, for example, is lifted entirely out of context. She never insulted nuns. It is not our practice to insult nuns despite the fact that nuns are pathetic sexually frustrated religion whores.
I (we, you, everyone who matters) do not recognize the need for any [nonsense reference deleted] to explain why. It’s sufficiently explained by science. So the answer to your question is: The Singularity.
Why do atheists need a context to express our views? Do people run into a church and demand the context of what the liar is saying at the pulpit? That is exactly the sort of double-standard that we seek to eliminate.
Oh, sure. When someone is Bob the Jack Chick guy, and spouts a bunch of nonsense about imaginary sky pixies, it’s okay. And everyone can understand what’s going on. But when a rational person espouses rational views, everyone is suddenly deaf, dumb, and blind. Especially dumb. It just ain’t fair! :mad:
Why can’t I do what Diogenes did — assume the proto-identity of a popular figure, and have a joke thread? Why does mine have to be a parody of his? Why isn’t every rant then not a parody of some other rant?
Ya know, if I could have read that while I was staring at a mirror and wearing my silvered sunglasses, I’d just have to admit that the guy I nearly saw standing behind me would be able to explain everything…
:wally