hajario, you have asked a ‘can of worms’ question (lots of tangled opinions, few absolute answers). It probably deserves a new thread, because it is a huge question.
IANAExpert in Deaf culture, but as far as I can tell, it often comes down to this: are Deaf people “disabled”.
(Of course, what exactly is your definition of “disabled”?)
Some Deaf people consider themselves just as “abled” as the vast majority of the rest of the population. As such, they do not want pity or handouts, they feel it demeans them.
Some Deaf people do accept SSI (“Social Security”) and other assistance. They have their own compelling reasons for doing so, and do not feel demeaned by it.
Some Deaf people sell the cards you mention. They consider it their ‘job’. Other Deaf people consider this nothing more than begging.
In general, it’s the disabled people who require special assistance, right? “Abled” people are, well… “able” to get by without this assistance, right? If you accept assistance, is that admitting you are “disabled”?
“You run fast, for a white guy.” “You shoot well, for a girl. You’re pretty smart, for a <insert demeaning slur>.” Are these really complements? Not really. “You run fast. You shoot well. You are smart.” Now those are complements. “Gee, you get along in life just fine, for a Deaf person.” No, no, no… It’s as if being a white guy, a girl, a <slur>, or Deaf is somehow some disability or obstacle to overcome, instead of just the way God made us. Now let’s be realistic, some people do believe these conditions are disabilities or impediments. Those are sometimes considered “unenlightened”.
“But Jimbrowski,” you gasp “surely deafness is a disability!” Consider: a Deaf couple might spontaneously jump in their car, buy a map (and read it), drive to an unfamiliar place, get a hotel room and dinner, go to a movie, go hiking in the national park the next day, send back postcards to their friends, take pictures, overspend on chintzy souvenirs, and brag to their coworkers when they return. That doesn’t fit my personal concept of a “disabled” person. So… are they disabled?
Consider someone who’s missing the bottom third of their left arm (born that way). Are they “disabled”? Several years ago there was just such a person pitching for the Yankees. Most perfectly “abled” people would never be capable of playing in the big leagues, so how can we consider this guy “disabled”? He pitched for the Yanks, that’s about as “able” as you can get.
Now please… I have said things in this post that are strictly matter of opinion, and there will be those with strong opinions to the contrary. Particularly my feeble attempt to define “disabled”; who is and who is not “disabled” is a fiery Great Debate if I ever saw one.
And like I said, this probably deserves it’s own thread (it’s a huge topic).