However, that’s not the way I learned it. I understood that the ability to perceive the odor is genetically controlled, and that everyone produces the odor. A little searching turned up this site, which says
According to an article in Sports Illustrated, Babe Ruth was at a high-toned banquet and was offered asparagus. He refused it, saying it “makes my urine smell.”
I’ve polled my family on this question. About half can detect the asparagus smell and half can’t. My father says he can’t. My mother has passed away and failed to leave instructions about this important matter in her will. I have three older brothers. Two of us can smell the asparagus and two can’t. I can only assume that my mother could smell the asparagus pee.
Yeah, but have you tried smelling each other’s pee? I’m convinced genetics and asparagus-pee-smelling are linked, but I wanna know for sure whether genetics controls the ability to produce asparagus-scented pee or the ability to perceive asparagus-scented pee.
C’mon Bob! Go that next step in the name of science!
All I can say is :eek:! BobT, if the answer to this question is yes, perhaps you should answer privately via e-mail, otherwise you’ll never live it down.
My brother and his wife ate asparagus and gave some to their daughter. They didn’t detect anything in her diaper. She didn’t say anything one way or the other. However, she’s not quite two years old yet.
You can’t have it both ways. If the research was done well, how can scientist remain divided? How hard can it be to design a simple experiment? 20 people, chosen at random, passing hot steaming urine under their noses, urine which was collected from some glutton who just ate 3 pounds of asparagus in the last half hour. Approximately 10 people should be able to detect the smell and 10 shouldn’t. That is, if that is a correct number.
Personally, I love asparagus. I can urinate within a short time after eating and be overwhelmed with the smell of the mercaptans(or whatever it is). Now I have to ask my family. Thanks a bunch!
Sterling proposal, samclem. So…out of the 10,000+ members of this board, do you think we can get twenty “volunteers”?
Actually, you bring up a good point: just how can scientists be divided on an issue (and an important one at that) that seems to be easily resolved? I was hoping that a urologist would post to this thread with up-to-date data, but it looks like I’ll remain disappointed.