I have been told (irl) *where *the Singularity will occur, but for the sake of anonymity I’d rather not reveal that particular detail. I’m more interested in the consequences: Note that as a result of the de-monetization of mercenary Western culture the Singularity would bring to most of the world, money qua money becomes vastly de-prestiged, aside from merely de-valued in the sense that say global markets would notice in a hurry, though that too, of course.
Ok. But Maria Yuryevna Sharapova is uniquely positioned to capitalize on this financial “collapse”, such that she culls over $100 billion from the fallout for her personal fortune. This would still constitute a vast personal fortune, even within the context of near-global de-monetization, and a rather unique one, though still not something to the scale of the economies of powerful first-world nations (which of course won’t be what they used to be due to the global de-nationalization that will proceed from the Singularity, but for the sake of brevity let us simply note that detail without exploring it in depth at this time).
I submit that Maria Yuryevna Sharapova would be a force for wit and goodness in this eventual eventuality (the Singularity), softly wielding her hard power in a sometimes unyielding way, with empathic “touch” and “charm” such that the proles finally countenance that, until now, they neither acknowledge their inability to acknowledge their individual guilt, nor accept their personal non-existence beyond that of an effect of something much deeper and universal, which is really the keystone of an effective and cromulent Singularity to begin with.
So, for these reasons, I vote “proceed” on the question of Maria Yuryevna Sharapova, and I think you should, too.