It’s actually happened a good bit, since the upgrade. Next time you see a thoroughly confusing thread, compare the name on the first post with the name listed under “thread starter”.
I am kind of curious, though, to see such a thread “fresh”, so to speak. I’ve always seen them after a few replies.
What you see is a collapsed thread, with the gray top bar “Author”, “Thread”, “New Thread”, and “Post Reply”, squashed right on top of the gray bottom bar, “All times are GMT -6 hours. The time now is 9:11 PM. New Thread Post Reply”.
So basically just the two gray bars, with nothing else.
Really weird-lookin’.
Yup, it’s gray. Gray on the link, gray in your post. Gray, gray, gray. Kind of an off-off-off-white or an off-off-off-black, whereas pink is more of an off-red.
Mayap your monitor’s boogered up? I mean, why would the forum headings be in pink?
Naah, didn’t say they’re pink, only seen this color being called pink. But I misremembered this thread: Board Background Color It was the gray post text background being called pink here, the headings were agreed on being kinda lavender. But not gray.
But wait!
I could believe that you have your monitor’s color temperature set to a ludicrously low value. Then the kinda lavender would be yellowed and appear as a neutral gray to you. But then the post text background really would look pink. Yikes. But you said it’s gray. And you didn’t disagree on the bars being called kinda lavender. Not gray.
Even if you changed your monitor since then, if you see one of those colors as gray, then you have to see the other as a different color (real color, not just a different brightness). Either kinda lavender bars or kinda pink posts. Gray bars -> pink posts, or gray posts -> kinda lavender bars. Not gray.
I did a quick search at the vBulletin forum for the name of their ‘corporate identity color’, but all I found was the name (“tableheadbgcolor”) of the variable containing the default (the dope uses the default) HTML color code value of #8080A6. #848484 would be gray. #8080a6 is not gray.
In the original 0…255 range the Y/Cb/Cr chromaticity coordinates (recommendation Rec 601-1 coefficients) for this color are 19.0128 / -3.088 . You could call it a pale lavender. Definitely not gray.
This time on a neutral black background, here’s the original color, followed by an achromatic equiluminant gray (#848484 , Y = 132.347):
You’re right, definitely not gray there. The one on the left appears lavenderian on this monitor (I view these threads at home and, uh, at the office). The one on the right, grayistic.
So maybe it depends at lot on the background. The background here is a kind of gray, so…
mnemosyne, No, no, no! All we have ever and hardly agreed on was this color being kinda lavender! (Actually, if you’re looking at the board through a red filter, the bars become quite dark, almost black, with a red background…)
I once had to call the bars “bluish-purple-what-ever-the-official-color-name-is” for lack of a proper name. This color needs an official name. Now, if Cecil just would say it’s turquoise. He’s always right. Period.
…
Wait a minute, Cecil is color blind, isn’t he?. It would look like turquoise to him. Forget it.