Awake - Starts Tonight - 03/01/12

ignorance accidentally fought: I was familiar with the plural form of this word, but not this singular form.

ignorance accidentally fought plus ungrateful nitpick: in which case it should have been “Unless her parenthesis objects.”

If he has cancer he might just be left after surgery with a semicolon.

Ampersand!

I thought the wife looked way too young to be married to him and have a son that old, but it turns out the actress is actually 38. She could pass for 25 easy.

Aw jeez, I’m 37. Does that mean I’m old enough to have a son that old?

Well yeah, the kid is 15 so that works out fine. I thought she was about ten years younger than she really was.

:frowning:

I’m old.

She was in Terriers. I think she was playing younger in that (30, I’d say).

I thought she was too young too. I looked it up and saw she was born in Portland. My sister is the same age. If the actress grew up here as well, it’s possible they knew each other. I’ll ask my sister next time I talk to her.

I finally got around to this on my DVR last night. I liked it. I was willing to forgive whatever confusion that I had because the concept really works for me. And as a fan of the late, great Terriers, I just can’t help but wish a little success for an alumna of that show.

Yeah, I’m with Mrs. Drum God… He’s dead and this is his after life experience. Mother and son are both alive and mourning. Interestingly, on the IMDB page, Jason Isaacs is listed as appearing in 7 episodes, the wife is in 9 episodes and the son is in 8 episodes… Wonder what’s up with that?

I’ve found number of episodes in error on other shows. IMDB just screws up every once in a while.

And they usually screw up episode casts when a show is first starting. I wouldn’t put any stock in it.

In this thread the OP links to an interview where the show’s creator says one world is real and one is a dream. So unless he’s lying or changes his mind later on, I guess that’s one aspect of the show we no longer have to wonder about.

Interesting; I hadn’t seen that. And it’s kinda disappointing, really. I think I would have preferred that there was no reveal about which world is real. Now the whole thing will be about people trying to pick up clues and figure out which world is real and which is a dream - and that question is the least interesting angle to the story for me.

So, any opinions about tonight’s episode? I thought it was a little better than the pilot. I guess that part with the police captain and guy talking about taking out Mike’s family ads another mystery.

And then on top of that, I guess we have to figure out if the conspiracy is in the real world or the dream. I’m guessing dream.

I don’t know about that - I’ve been googling and reading a bunch of interviews with the show’s creators, and they all state that there’s no pre-determined ending for the show (although they do have an idea for how they’re ending this season), and that they aren’t really concerned with showing which reality (or both, or neither) is real - they just want both of the realities to be interesting and compelling.

Link:

Link:

My problem is that there are things happening in both realities that he’s not present for. So if one of these worlds doesn’t really exist, did he just dream that his wife went to Cole’s house? Did he just dream that Rex went to the storage locker? Did he dream the conversation between his boss and the goon? How can things be happening in his dreams unless he is witness to them?

Either the writers are playing loose with the concept, or else both of these worlds are “real,” or maybe he’s in a coma just dreaming all of it.

Hey, thanks Waenara; that sounds a whole lot better than what I was seeing. I guess I focused on this quote from exec producer Gordon: “But there is also a big question that is answered and that we drive toward at the end of this season so which is, you know, what exactly did happen that night? And that is a question that, you know, will be answered and should give people a pretty strong sense of closure in terms of an ongoing question.” That made me think they were definitely going to resolve the dream-world question, but I see now it appears to be just one element in an overarching milieu. Both Killen and Gordon seem to be thinking along the same lines I was.

I dunno; I’m not sure it’s necessary to have Britten in every scene. It’s entirely plausible that parts of his “dreams” are in third person, where people interact outside of his presence. Third-person narrative may not be the way dreams are most usually depicted, but I don’t see why it’s not possible.

I saw it but wasn’t really able to give it full attention; will have to watch it again on the DVR. But yes, there appears to be a developing mystery surrounding the crash and what actually happened that night, the resolution of which has been promised this season by the creator and producer.