How dare you attribute a quote to me in this post ,
when it is obvious that the post was made by Peter Morris, in this earlier post! .
I haven’t known you to be an out and out liar, a fabricator of imagined events. Have I just not been paying attention? Or have you had me fooled?
Anyway, at the very least, you owe me an apology.
(I’d expect stuff like this from Bryan Ekers… but glee??? Shit. I thought you were better than this.)
Oh, please. Clearly he erred in attributing those quotes to you, nevertheless, the intent of the post is quite obvious even to the most feeble-minded of readers. Whether you made the statements in question or simply agree with them is immaterial to the point *glee was trying to get across.
the thread itself held no interest to me, but I checked out the last page, just in case.
so, glee misattributed a quote? Instead of, in the thread saying “dude, that wasn’t me, it was some one else”, you instead open up a new thread to call him a liar?
schmuck.
Dude, chill. It was probably an honest mistake. Much like the coding in this thread so far. 
These aren’t the coding errors you are looking for. Move along.
So I should forgive him? (Or set up monitoring cameras on the SDMB to ensure my safety?) maybe a dozen “hail Mary’s?”
“To err is human…” Shakespeare
“Kill them all.” Kurtz, Lecter, and other spiritual guides.
Oh, I’m so conflicted…
(What was glee’s point?)
hey, mine was ok.
Have you SEEN that thread?
You go in there, you take your mind in your hands.
I ain’t posting in there no more, no thank yew!
I’m running out of valium! I’m starting to remember where I buried those WMDs!
Really? Could it be your “physical or mental health”*?
*That quote by Snakespirit taken out of context while he was ripping constantly on Czarcasm. I’ll be willing to wager that when this thread is dead for a couple days, **Snakespirit ** will renew it for a non sequitor. (Then again, now that he knows my prediction, maybe it will stop any more of this b.s.)
It’s an age-old tradition. I don’t expect skimmers to understand.
Oh, and thanks for the “Schmuck.”
Hey! You could apply for Randi’s million dollar challenge!
Unless you don’t want a million dollars?
He just wanted to hear you reasoning for agreeing with Peter Morris’ statements about Randi. Given that Peter Morris has never (to my knowledge) adequately explained the reasoning behind his statements about Randi, I suspect that glee was hoping you might be able to. Or not. Whatever.
Well, I think we should let glee speak for e’s self… (e = his/her, since I don’t know, too lazy to look).
In any case, I didn’t agree with Peter’s Details, just with the Peter Principle. Perhaps that wasn’t clear. Still… Still…
What if I attributed to you something lekatt had said? How would you feel about that? We’re talking raw emotions here, buddy!
Keep them cards and letters comin!
Hee hee. 
Given that lekatt and I are diametrically opposed, it would be instantly and completely obvious that the statements were not mine. One need only to read the thread in question to see the truth. It’s a non-issue to my mind.
My point exactly!
That it’s a non-issue?
When can we expect the “SnakeSpirit Pits Himself for Needlessly Flaming glee” thread?
This is just silly.