Think again! What a turd and a half you think you are, but you are only 1/5 right! You’re 7½ turds easy, and that ain’t even in Metric, but Canadian Moose turds.
And Danimal, don’t think you’re off the hook either!
You guys are plonked from the same rear end, you are!
Sadly, **Smeghead ** (if that IS your name!), you don’t win in this round. But I’m betting someday you do, since you set your sites so low. Talk about having nothing to look forward to! Isn’t there a soap opera you need to be attending to?
Montfort is a poopy-head. Not only that, but I hear he’s gotta go abroad to get laid. Not even the witness protection program was enough to hide his evil ways amongst the women here in the states.
BTW, this is in response to an IMHO thread Monfort started. I’d post a link but I’m too lazy.
I didn’t take offence, even if he was serious. I did start it and I do not hide the fact that I’m a big girl. I don’t know how he found out about the ugly part though.
Montfort- You have been posting some real stupid shit lately. I don’t know what’s gotten into you. You just don’t call a woman fat and ugly, even in jest. And don’t be nit-picking over the rules about what you can and can’t link to from this board. Please stop it.
Biggirl, who, to be honest, I don’t even know, was joking when she called me a poopyhead. I knew that, and made an outrageous response, because:
We were in the Pit.
She was outrageous to me.
(3. Hi Opal!)
We’re both kidding.
I don’t know if she’s “fat”; for all I know, the “big” in her name is a reference to not being a little girl anymore. In other words, she’s a grown up.
I called her “ugly” because it usually follows “fat” (you don’t hear people calling others “fat and beautiful” all that often). Also, this the Pit. I have no idea what she looks like, so I’ll take Ukulele Ike’s word that she’s a babe.
As far as nit-picking about the rules of the board, are you referring to my questions about Napster in ABTMB? I asked a few questions with a few aims: to find out exactly why the Chicago Reader is afraid of Napster, and to point out the hypocricies in those policies. I didn’t drag it out, which I thought about doing, because, like others, I’m sick of arguing about it. I really doubt I became a thorn in anyone’s side with those posts.
Finally, you’re not my mother, so don’t tell me what to do. Also, I really don’t know who you are, either, so I’m going to assume you really don’t me, too. So, how do you know that something’s gotten into me?
Thanks Wolfman! You’re as perceptive as a real Doper!
Hard to believe only a few people get what’s going on around here. Why lately, 2sense had the stupidity to say sock puppets were only used to reinforce a person’s argument. Not that I’ve seen. They appear for one reason only- to prove that there is no such thing as being banned.
andros, though is out to lunch. What is it boy? Want
MaMa TubaDiva to scare the boogie man out from under the bed? Jerk, it’s your little sister, here to tweak your nose by rattling some chains. Better not go far from MaMa, though, because she can’t really kill the boogie man - she only says that to fool the toadies like you. To make you toe the line. To treat you like an idiot.
Exactly where in my post did I exclude any other possible use of a sock puppet?
A poster asked a question and I answered. I’m not Cecil, I was just trying to help. Perhaps you noticed that Astroboy14 was grateful for the info?
I’d find your implication that you were one of the few who understand what’s going on on the board more credible if you were aware that the definition that I posted is the proper definition of “sock puppet”. The term comes from the mental image of a person having a conversation with their own sock-covered hands. Some do refer to returning bannees as “socks”, I prefer the term “troll respawn”. You feel free to refer to them however you please but don’t take the same liberties with me, capish?