Ballot stuffing

Remember when the 20 Mules guy and Rudy were presenting videos they claimed were evidence of ballot stuffing? Given that trump’s supporters are known for being a bit more fanatical than Joe’s, shouldn’t the question have been asked: how do you know they aren’t votes for trump? Maybe without those votes, he would have lost even worse than he did.

You are asking a (hypothetical) rational question of an irrational actor. The answer would’ve just been gibberish.

Because their guy lost. The ONLY possible explanation is that whoever won cheated, therefore any evidence of cheating is obviously evidence against their opponent. It doesn’t hold up to even rudimentary scrutiny of course, but that’s irrelevant. The “logic” is complete, end of story.

“Hello! I know you think that Democrats literally drink the blood of children that they keep locked away in the basement of a pizza place that has no basement. Further, you think think that JFK will come back and endorse Trump. And, you believe that the Democrats brought in millions of illegal voters in order to win the presidency, but lose in the House. And, you think that Trump is being falsely accused, while also believing that Biden is simultaneously a sleepy, senile old man and the master of an international crime syndicate. And, you also believe that the COVID vaccine contains nanobots so that Bill Gates can track you, while holding a phone with GPS in your pocket all the time. Now, with that out of the way, maybe the non-existent ballot boxes that you claimed were used to stuff the ballots were for Trump and not Biden. What are your thoughts on that?”

“Purple Monkey Dishwasher!!!”

Mackdonna Handheld Shoehorn Butterhorse!

Seriously (even though I don’t believe that even the OP intends this to be serious), the whole point was just to discredit ANYTHING that wasn’t a win for Trump. Something he was doing back in 2016, much less 2020. Anything that isn’t a win for Trump is because of the rigged system/cheating.

So ipso facto, any evidence of cheating could ONLY be against him.

:roll_eyes:

And as multiple threads have shown, there was a lot more proven (!) efforts by various Trump supporters to cheat in his favor than against him (the numerous “I know how my mom/wife would have wanted to vote so there was nothing wrong with me filling in her ballot!”) but even those were caught. Which in and of itself fuels their (Trump and his supporters) persecution fantasies.

Argle bargle morble whoosh?

I entered purple.monkey.dishwasher into What3Words and that entry turns out to be associated with two locations: one each in La Junta, Colorado and Willow Creek, California.

Now I’m ruined for listening to news regarding Tan the Conman’s blatherings. I’m going to be punching in his randomly chosen 3-word strings to see if there’s a place he might be signalling that he’s going to run to, a place without an extradition treaty with the United States.

If you are going purely from the “logic” presented in the Mules video, its that they found X many people who passed by various liberal non-profits and then passed by voter drop boxes. So therefore it must be the case that the ballots were coming from these liberal non-profits.

As to the question of whether there were people going by conservative non-profits and then going by ballot boxes multiple times, they don’t say. Nor did they say whether people went by Starbucks and ballot boxes, or Liberal non-profits and gas stations, or actually any form of negative control that would be the first thing that any reasonable investigator would want in order to determine whether their finding was anything beyond random coincidence. But of course that is because reasonable investigation is precisely what they wanted to avoid.

The one in Willow Creek uses monkeys plural

Thanks for the correction. As much as I use What3Words, I really should not have made that mistake.

I understood that reference!

I checked that - it seemed to be a major flaw with what3words to allow multiple places
for particular word combinations - I got 3 suggestions. As Saint_Cad said, one uses
monkeys plural, and another in Abu Dhabi uses purples plural.
Still - seems to be a bit of potential for confusion there .

Tom Scott did a video on the issues with what3words

Could you post a link of that … i’ve just scrolled through his videos all the way
back to 2013 when w3w was released and can’t see anything that looks likely.
(But that’s my next weeks viewing sorted !)
Cheers.

My mistake. It was Andrew Steele.

Given that my circle of people i interact with doesn’t include a lot of these people I don’t get to ask this much, but my response is usually “If Trump, as President of the United States was unable to keep Joe Biden from stealing the election, how do you expect private citizen Trump to stop President Biden doing it again?” So far, no coherent responses.

Sadly, the answer is normally “be a patriot”. IE refuse to recognize the powers of the current government, pay it taxes, attempt armed insurrection, threaten more violence to the people overseeing things if it doesn’t go the way they want.

That is some great information. The thing that gets me, though, is he really has no idea what to do with his hands while he’s talking.