> That would be an opinion. I obviously don’t share that
opinion.
Use of first person in argument shows self-indulgence. Desist.
> As far as I know, no. However, I did grow up in Arlington
County, Virginia; so, perhaps I have seen her driving.
See above.
> By her own statements in this thread. You might want to revisit the bit about the parking (which necessitated driving on the wrong side of the road) and the bit about blowing through a red light. Both of those actions (driving on the wrong side of the road (afer all, someone may pull out of their driveway not expecting some fool to come barrelling down the wrong side of the road), and blowing through a traffic light (after all, someone might proceed on the green light not expecting some fool to come barrelling into the intersection) are dangerous.
You have used the letter e 55 times in the above paragraph. It results in boredom to the reader. Desist.
> OMG! You did read it and you apparently understood what you read. Yet you make the posting you made. Truly amazing.
Usage of acronyms indicates lethargy.
> That would be fine if that’s all she did. What she did in addition was to bitch about getting caught and having to pay the penalty.
You dont pay a penalty. You pay a fine.
> Yes, but irrelevant in this case becuase I don’t whine to the world when I get caught. I suck it up like an adult.
Trying to enforce your ideas on others is not nice. Desist.
> I’ll be happy to do a websearch for reputable sources with both that info and also for those who got hurt. You do realize that I’m not addressing the bit about the car after it’s parked but during the actual motion of the vehicle–on the wrong side of the road–to get it into that position, I trust.
The second sentence is too long. The first sentence is plain wrong. And never try to rhyme; it decreases the arguments credibility.
> See above from another poster about why the cops enforce both the misdemeanor laws and felonies.
See above for explanation of whats wrong with this.
> Irrelevant. The posting to which I responded implied (and one poster, Christina, even stated) that all cops are like that. The way it works in the World of the Real and Mature is that if someone asserts someting, like “Cops get to enforce only the laws they want to,” then that individual has to provide the evidence.
Too much of convoluted logic. Use simple short pithy non-repititous lines and legitimate wrods for getting your point across to the other person, namely the arguee with rary discord which ctherwise result in nonsensical rules to apply for machine translation.
> One final thing: you would do a lot better if you knew what you were talking about. Evidently, from your posting above, you neither know what you have read nor what you have posted.
As mentioned before, too often use of the letter e.
Have fun!