A couple of days ago I barked my shin. That is, I slipped and got a slight injury when my shin slid at right angles across a hard surface. Had I done this to my elbow I would have said I skinned or grazed it.
Do you use the term “barked”, and if so, do you use it for things other than your shin?
According to the OED, mbh is likely correct. The first usage of “bark” to mean scrape is in 1850, where a writer speaks of barking his hand. Me, I only bark my shins or possibly my elbow, everything else is a scrape.
The things you can bark are all non-fleshy, which makes sense. You couldn’t bark the verandah over the toyshop.
The pattern of use is interesting in that it varies and is all over the place. My wife (also Australian, but unlike me, born here) had never heard of it (same look she gave me when I called an item of manchester a “counterpane”).
OK, I’m totally baffled by this one. I’ve heard the word “counterpane” in an old poem by Robert Louis Stevenson, and never known what it meant, but what is an “item of manchester”? (Please have patience with us ignerunt Mericuns.)
Barking ones shins makes the most sense when compared to ‘barking a tree’ ie removing the outer coat and getting right down to the wood. The shin is the area of the body most susceptible to skin loss exposing bare bone, as there is no musclle (and precious little other tissue) between skin and bone.
I’ve seen trees barked showing that gleaming yellow-white damp wood underneath, and I’ve seen far too many shins barked showing bright periosteal tissue!
I’ve heard it applied to knuckles, when bone is exposed.
Wounds on the knees and ankles and elsewhere which exposed bare bones tended to be far more extensive than merely abrasion injuries removing skin.
I had already checked this thread three times, but I came back to see what Qadgop the Mercotan had to say. I was not disappointed, by the way. That’s a measure of the weight that QtM carries in these parts. Og, I wish I had that kind of clout. I’m just a glimmer in the firmament.