Baseball question about the DH

I’ve always wondered: Does the DH have to bat for the pitcher? What I mean is this. Suppose you have a good pitcher who was also a good batter, say Babe Ruth. ( Unlikely, I know, but go with me on this one ) On the days that he pitched, would it be legal for him to bat for himself and have the DH bat for someone else- say a SS who was dynomite in the field but weak with the stick?

It’ll never come up, I know, but I’ve wondered this for a while now. Does anyone know the answer and the apropriate rule covering this?

Yes, the DH has to hit for the starting pitcher. Rule 6.10 says that:

I know at some lower levels of baseball (the HS I went to for example) you can DH for any player though.

Basically, yes, the DH must substitute for the pitcher and no one else:

Rule 6.10:

An interesting aside: In 1988, Billy Martin used the good-hitting pitcher Rick Rhoden as his DH. I’m not sure who pitched the game.

This is probably a dumb question, but I’ll ask anyway in case the answer’s not as obvious as I think: AL pitchers have the option not to take advantage of the DH, right? I mean, I don’t know why they wouldn’t, but.

The DH is not mandatory, so pitchers can bat for themselves if the team desires.

Indeed, a quick visit to Project Retrosheet confirms that Rick Rhoden served as the DH for Yankee pitcher John Candelaria on June 11, 1988. He had a ground-out and a sacrifice fly in two plate appearances before being taken down for a pinch-hitter.

The last occasion of which I am aware when an American League team opted not to use a DH occurred when Ken Brett, a lifetime .262 hitter, was pitching for the White Sox. He batted for himself on July 6 and September 23, 1976.

There’s another exception here as well: if the DH is moved into the field, then the pitcher must bat for himself for the rest of the game. This happens every so often in extra-inning affairs.

Rhoden, who spent all but his two years as a Yankee in the NL, had a career batting average of .238. However, it was .278 in 1986, the year before he joined the Yankees.

But I think Billy had him DH mainly for the publicity.

Thanks for the answer!

According to my “the baseball encylopedia”, RickRhoden played for LA from 1974-1978 and had a carreer batting average of .213, 1 home run. It also shows that billy martin never managed LA, and never even managed in the NL, billy martin managed from 1969-1977. Is my encylopedia wrong?

opps, my encylopedia was published in 1979. I havent watched much baseball since then. Sorry.

PS-Rhoden,who was traded to Pittsburgh for Jerry Reuss, is a scratch golfer. Good for a guy who had a congenitally deformed leg.

Rick Rhoden

Note that in 1988 he had one at-bat and a batting average of .000 for the Yankees.

I believe Rhoden was the DH not as much for publicity, but more that the Yankees had some injuries and were short of right-handed hitters that day.

However, as I recall (and I was following the Yankees closely that year), Martin suggested he might use Rhoden as a DH weeks if not months before it actually happened, and there was considerable press coverage at the time. It wasn’t a spur of the moment thing. On the other hand, Martin never repeated it, even though Rhoden had some success (sacrifice fly), which leads me to think a big part of it was the PR.