This is a possession question. Runner on second, fly ball to outfield, runner leaves the base as he doesn’t know if ball will be caught. Ball is caught, runner heads back to base, outfielder throws ball to SS covering to base. Ball is a bit short, SS stretches to catch it with bare hand, his foot on the base. SS grabs ball, but never lifts it off the dirt. Is this possession? If so, the runner is out. If not, runner is not.
Yup, the umpires get the big bucks because they can make decisions like that by observing. In the same way that a ball touching the ground during a catch in football is fine as long as the receiver maintains control, a shortstop can establish full control over the ball while it is touching the ground.
When does the runner touch the base? Does he touch the base? A tie goes to the runner, it takes time to prove control, the runner won’t be out if he’s bobbling the ball catching it in the air. The ump determines if the SS had possession prior to the runner touching the base.
Excuse a pet peeve of mine after umping various things, but there are no ties. The ball beats the runner or vice versa. Although that’s an oft-quoted line, it is nowhere in the baseball rulebook. I wonder who started it. Google Ngram doesn’t show it until 1972, but I certainly heard it as a kid in the 60’s
what do umpires get paid these days? i remember when Ron Luciano wrote his books they didn’t make all that much but that was what 20-30 years ago when it was still somewhat fun to be an umpire
Interesting - cricket has a similar ‘rule’ - the benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman.
What this means in practise is that the umpire has to be pretty damn sure that the batsman IS out before he puts his finger up (the signal for ‘out’ in cricket). But it’s never mentioned in the Laws.
So, of course we get commentators (and fans) all the time saying things like - ‘I’m not sure that was out - there’s some doubt there etc, etc’. To which the only reply is ‘get a qualification, put on a white coat, and get out there and umpire yourself’.
And before you ask, video replay has NOT ended those discussions. It just moved them around a bit.
He doesn’t have to “prove” he has control. Why would he?
Are you seriously telling me that, if you had your fingers wrapped around a baseball which was still touching the ground, you wouldn’t have control of it? That the only way for someone to reach the conclusion you had control at that point would be for you to actually lift it off the ground? :dubious:
Even if the umpire discerns a play to be a tie, a runner returning to a base on a caught fly would not benefit from them. A batter/runner is out if “he or first base is tagged before he touches first base.” [Rule 5.09(a)(10)] A runner, however, is out if "“He fails to retouch his base after a fair or foul ball is legally caught before he, or his base, is tagged by a fielder.” [Rule 5.09(b)(5)] (Italics mine)
So with the batter, the defense needs to complete their task before the runner gets there, but a runner returning on a caught fly needs to complete his task before the defense.