Umm, I am curious. I would be interested in learning how to observe and evaluate my enviornment using processess above and beyond the “limited” levels of knowledge and understanding (cognitive?) processes I am saddled with…
There ya go. This has created a (healthy, IMO) self realisation that I need to think for myself, wherever possible.
Anecdotally, it seems to me that the majority of “science-types” accept the possibility of intelligent life existing elsewhere as very likely (given the sheer size of the observable universe). Implying that they are open minded to the idea of technologically advanced visitors and artifacts.
Problem is, the scientific methodology (observe, theorise, test, refine, retest, publish, get famous) adopted by the scientific community at large requires pretty exacting requirements for what constitutes “conclusive proof”.
It must be frustrating for a scientist to passionately want to meet ET, but to continually be presented with dissapointedly out-of-focus photos and what not. I am no scientist, but I know it’s frustrating for me.
(Same with the Sci-Fi series “Ghost Hunters”. Hehe: “Omi-god! Did you hear that thump!? I have a high EM reading!”)
True, I wish common sense was more common…
Deduction reasoning (logical thinking?) can be taught, I believe.
And finally, pattern recognition is kinda finicky, and should not be the sole deciding factor. You see a cloud shaped like a dragon. It’s still a cloud. You can Google up all kinds of optical illusion tests just for fun.
Which only proves that a lot of very intelligent people want to believe… But scientists need more than personal stories to state a positive opinion on the matter.
How disappointing.
Good God! That site was in English, but hell-if-I-know what it was saying!
Maybe something from a less advanced “advanced thinking” course.
I need a drink…
The Evil Atheist Conspiracy does not exist!
It says that on page three of my EAC handbook, so it must be true.
it’s a cookbook!!!
We only seek To Serve Man.
Helluva way to treat a guest, Squink.
I hear and read this, or variations on it, pretty often, and I was wondering if anyone could elaborate on this line of thought. There’s definitely something attractive about it, but isn’t it equally absurd to think that life is something special that must have developed elsewhere? This viewpoint has always seemed very biased to me.
You have things mixed up. The idea of life being only on earth makes life “special.” If life occurs on many planets then it isn’t special.
Thanks, Contrapuntal. Hadn’t seen (or even heard of) that before.
I don’t know why skeptics are always so “they aren’t real and that’s that” about things we can’t see or prove exist right away. Just because YOU haven’t seen one, doesn’t mean they’re not real and the people who believe or have seen one are crazy.
You can sputter off as much scientific babble and “facts” as you want, the true fact is, you don’t know if there is or isn’t another species out there that can defy the laws of physics.
Also, it’s pretty egotistical to think that we’re the only ones alive in the whole space system.
diggleblop, I haven’t seen anyone say that he thinks we’re the only ones alive in the whole “space system.” And by the way, if they’re laws of physics, then aliens couldn’t defy them either. That’s just a nitpick, I think you’re saying the laws as we understand them.
We skeptics don’t think the people who believe them are crazy (well, not all of them, because many are really crazy), but that they are not very good at evaluating evidence to reach conclusions.
No, sceptics say ‘what evidence have you got?’.
No scientist ever says ‘that’s that.’ The whole basis for science is that you continually reassess current thinking in the light of new evidence.
I believe there is an invisible force that pulls matter together.
I am confident there is or has been or will be life elsewhere in the Universe.
I don’t believe that crop circles are the work of aliens, because I’ve seen them being made (by people with 2 planks and a rope )
All the UFO evidence over the last 5 decades or so boils down to some poorly observed lights in the sky.
Even UFO enthusiasts concede that 90% of ‘sightings’ are clearly aircraft / birds / planets / hoaxes etc.
Ah we scientists with our babble and ‘facts’. What have we ever discovered? Apart from computers, the Internet, spaceflight, the human genome, electron microscopes and post-it notes.
Compare this to those who use their imagination instead of scientific method. They have almost discovered how to talk to the dead, how to predict the future, when all life will end, dowsing, telepathy and perpetual energy. Just give them **more time and money ** and stop going on about the laws of physics, which they have nearly disproved.
Now let’s get serious. Although I appear to be a boring scientific type who likes evidence, I am in fact possessed of super-powers. :eek: I can determine when you will next use a computer (mmmmm … done), your location when you do (mmmmm … done) and teleport behind you (wheeeee!).
OK, I am now standing behind you! (You won’t have noticed any air current, because my method involves the complete replacement of matter at your location by me. )
Are you going to look round - or are you assuming I can’t defy the laws of physics?
Who are these people who think ‘we’re the only ones alive in the whole space system’? Have you got a cite for one of them? Or are you just making up quotes?